User talk:Meyerj

Project GAMMA

As 12th Special Forces Group (United States) shows in its lineage section, '1st Special Forces' in the official title of all SFGs is a reference to the 1st Special Service Force. I apologise if I'm telling you something you already know. I hope you won't mind me reinserting the reference with some clarification. Kind regards Buckshot06(prof) 14:54, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Negative! The 1st Special Forces of today refers to the regimental affiliation of all SF Groups in the US Army. The "Devils Brigade" was a light infantry, Canadian-American, unit which bared no resemblance to what we today know as Special Forces. It trained for action in the upper Scandinavian countries but only saw brief action in Alaska and then in Italy. The only reason that the US Army Center of Military History associated SF with the First Special Service Force of WWII was because they couldn't have a paper trail to the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) which was a United States intelligence unit and more in line with what SF was formed for.

File permission problem with File:AIRBORNE_CHIEF.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:AIRBORNE_CHIEF.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 06:51, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do what you want with it. It was from a publication of the US Army, which makes it open and free sourcing. I added a boarder to the top of it which came from the same publicaion. Meyerj (talk) 14:33, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have left a dispute on my page on General Michael D Healy. I edited the errors that you mentioned on the talk page but the dispute still stands. If there are other facts that you have questions about please let me know. I want the page to be as accurate as possible. I know General Healy well and the information is accurate the best of my knowledge. I would really like to see the dispute taken off. Thank you for your time. Kennedy Consulting 03:36, 10 November 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Doodledorf (talk • contribs)

Presidential Unit Citations

I see you have issues with my contributions to the article.

your criticism of my actions as a) vandalism and b) directed towards a particular unit are mistaken
My intent was to reduce the huge amount of text within the table. The citation quoted in full did not to my mind contribute to the article in a very meaningful way. Tables should be for information that works well as a table, and as such the text was not benefitting readability.
the information was not deleted but added to the unit to which it applied.
the article is already quite large at around 100 Kb, and it might be an idea to consider splitting into an article on the Citation itself and a List of... article for the instances of the Citation.
may I suggest a compromise position where the citation is precised into a form that conveys the circumstances under which the award was made (without the dramatic language).
I would also suggest that the specifics of the particular Presidential order belong in the form of a reference or footnote, as they really are a case of veering into minutinae.

How do you feel about my thinking?GraemeLeggett (talk) 22:15, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted my response on your talk page Meyerj (talk) 12:20, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

cases

5th Marines, 7th Marines, 9th Marines. 5th, 7th and 9th marines. Just like: The Prime Minister of Angola and the Prime Minister of Canada. The prime ministers of Angola and Canada. Primergrey (talk) 03:35, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You may or may not be more knowledgeable than I in reference to this subject. However, AP and DoD Style guides and even Wikipedia state Abbreviations should be capitalized. The full name of Marine Corps ground units of the infantry and artillery above the battalion are numbered and include the unit level, i.e. 9th Marine Regiment, 12th Marine Regiment. Abbreviated the word regiment is dropped and written as: 9th Marines or 12th Marines and when in sequence, 9th and 12th Marines instead of 9th and 12th Marine Regiments. Meyerj (talk) 16:18, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

A question, sir

I hope I'm not disturbing you but you may be the only person to answer a query I have due to your position in the WWR. What is the OFFICIAL policy about wounded or other discharged Marines appearing in full dress uniform at various functions? Do they seek permission from somewhere or are they inactive reserve? Thanks very much, some of old timers are mystified...Foofbun (talk) 00:33, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:7IN D&BC 1950.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:7IN D&BC 1950.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:17, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:7IN D&BC 1950.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:7IN D&BC 1950.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Meyerj. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Meyerj. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Westmoreland and the CIB

You and I both know that Generals often are the exception, not the rule. It is possible that his substantive rank was still LTC when he started in Korea, but as an artilleryman in WWII the CIB was likely not possible. Here are photos of him wearing it File:William Westmoreland.jpg & File:General William Westmoreland - NARA - 192555.tif. I also think he may be wearing a CIB in his infobox photo but it is so dark that only the Infantry Blue pops out. Here is a link for a reliable source reference: https://books.google.com/books?id=0dVEAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA2&dq=William+C.+Westmoreland+combat+infantry+badge&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiryt3SxernAhUHlXIEHRmQAw4Q6AEwAXoECAIQAg#v=snippet&q=Combat%20Infantryman&f=false. EricSerge (talk) 16:17, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mark W. Clark, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charleston.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]