User talk:Methodology~enwiki

I am a political science student and have been studying wiki projects to see how they impact and are impacted by politics. Lately I have been observing the way editors interact and especially whether administrative abuses are present in wiki projects. I will soon be ready to start editing but I think that should come,for me at least, AFTER I become more acquainted with the projects.

Re: Village pump question

If you are having problems with any any editor, please see the advice at Wikipedia:Resolving disputes. Tra (Talk) 23:08, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stop using sockpuppets to evade blocks. Thankyou. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 23:29, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see from my edit history; I am rarely on Wikipedia so your little lies and blocks mean nothing to me. I feel sorry for you that you have chosen to deal with the world in such a nasty and accusatory way. Methodology 01:22, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfC

Please note the RfC I began re; SarahEwart. ottawaman 22:14, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have little time for this but will try again. Methodology 23:49, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment on Sarah's RfC

[1] I deleted the material that wasn't relevant to the article. The article talk page is for talking about the article. Hope that clarifies. --Guinnog 00:10, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as sockpuppet

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All your edits have been reverted.

If you believe this block to be unjustified, you can contest it by adding {{unblock|reason}} to the bottom of this page and replacing reason with an explanation of why you think this is an unjust block. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.
²¹⁰physicq (c) 02:05, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Methodology. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Methodology~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

01:28, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

16:15, 22 April 2015 (UTC)