User talk:MetallicaMan800

Welcome!

Hello, MetallicaMan800, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as ThatSkynyrdKid 70, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Inks.LWC (talk) 23:01, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ThatSkynyrdKid 70

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ThatSkynyrdKid 70 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Inks.LWC (talk) 23:01, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ThatSkynyrdKid 70

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ThatSkynyrdKid 70 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —Eat me, I'm an azuki (talk · contribs · email) 13:24, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Hello, I'm McGeddon. An edit that you recently made to Creepypasta seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! McGeddon (talk) 16:13, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Gemmy Douglas Fir the talking tree original box.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Gemmy Douglas Fir the talking tree original box.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Douglas fir animat.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Douglas fir animat.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Cassette.png

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Cassette.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Gemmy Douglas Fir the talking tree original box.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Gemmy Douglas Fir the talking tree original box.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing articles

Wikipedia articles need reliable, secondary sources like newspaper articles and trade publications - an article needs at least two sources to meet general notability guidelines. Amazon should generally be avoided as a source since it's a commercial site. --McGeddon (talk) 20:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template issue

Hey MetallicaMan800, I've just replaced your edit on Douglas Fir the Talking Tree with the actual template, as I see you had inserted a comment involving a fake one. For future reference, the correct code would be {{About|the animatronic from the 1990s|the tree|Douglas Fir}}. Also, if you don't know how to do something in future, a quick search may do the trick, or at the very least, don't put comments about the template in the mainspace. Thanks, JQTriple7 (talk) 20:38, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:McGeddon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wildthing61476 (talk) 20:38, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. JQTriple7 (talk) 20:51, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:McGeddon. LjL (talk) 21:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. LjL (talk) 21:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. — MusikAnimal ^talk 21:31, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Douglas Fir the Talking Tree

The article Douglas Fir the Talking Tree has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Minor product with no claim of notability, sources provided are commercial or amateur, no mention on Google Books, most likely no reliable sources possible to find.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LjL (talk) 21:39, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Gemmy Douglas Fir the talking tree original box.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Gemmy Douglas Fir the talking tree original box.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. McGeddon (talk) 22:37, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Douglas fir animat.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Douglas fir animat.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. McGeddon (talk) 22:38, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Nightbeginstoshineteentitansgo.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Nightbeginstoshineteentitansgo.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I scanned it with my printer. Its of my CD copy. Please don't delete the image. MetallicaMan800 (talk) 10:50, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This was posted by a bot. Please follow the instructions provided. --JQTriple7 (talk) 04:12, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Nightbeginstoshineteentitansgo.jpeg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Nightbeginstoshineteentitansgo.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:04, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of B.E.R.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on B.E.R. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Rockypedia (talk) 20:56, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nightbeginstoshineteentitansgo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nightbeginstoshineteentitansgo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, I'm Mcmatter. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Creepypasta, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 14:04, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bite Me (Song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horror. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:11, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of YouTubers

Hi,

The List of YouTubers isn't a list of all YouTubers, or even a list of all important YouTubers. It's a list of YouTubers that (a) have an article about them on Wikipedia, or (b) include citations to multiple reliable sources showing "notability" (so magazines, newspapers, books, journals, particular high-quality websites with a reputation for accuracy and journalistic integrity, etc.). As it doesn't look like Timmy Fellows has an article and you didn't include any sources, I've reverted again. Please be advised that repeatedly making the same edits is considered "edit warring" and generally not a great idea :) Please let me know if you have questions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 14:30, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, I'm Ferret. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to THQ have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- ferret (talk) 21:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at THQ. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 23:54, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep your "rumors and speculation" off of Wikipedia. This is not the place for that. Unless you've got a reliable source (somewhere reputable like The Wall Street Journal or like IGN) writing an article about this "rumor", it does not belong in the THQ article. Sergecross73 msg me 13:39, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A YouTube channel page isn't a credible source

A page of a channel from YouTube isn't a credible source, and there were multiple other "smaller" YouTubers that were hacked. As you might have seen on the sources I provided to my section, one article said there were over 300 channels that were hacked in the incident. Picking a channel that was hacked in that incident and using it's page as a source isn't credible. As well as the fact that Google reverted the changes, it would be useless to any people viewing the article later on. I hope you understand. Pastorma (talk) 01:55, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I did not do this...

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

MetallicaMan800 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "WumboIsGud". The reason given for WumboIsGud's block is: "Clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia: vandalism and personal attac

Blocking administrator: Ponyo (talk • blocks)

Accept reason: I can see no reason to believe you are related to that vandal. I suspect (and you do not need to confirm) that you are in school and simply sharing an IP address. As such, I have lifted the autoblock and you should be free to edit now. Yamla (talk) 16:42, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MetallicaMan800 (talk) 16:31, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla, I blocked them directly for two weeks as they are the same editor. They created the WumboIsGud account at 15:45UTC and used it to vandalize and post personal attacks until 16:20UTC (this includes 4 attempts to edit the User:MetallicaMan800 user page which were caught in an edit filter). The Wumbo account was blocked at 16:27UTC and MetallicaMan800 then logged into this account from the same IP and device at 16:31UTC.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:49, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:57, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh. Thanks. That's really disappointing. --Yamla (talk) 17:08, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are you kidding me?

I can't even edit my own user page!!!! What the crap!?!? MetallicaMan800 (talk) 16:36, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla

Yamla I still can't edit. What's going on?

Why?

Yamla I'm still blocked... :p MetallicaMan800 (talk) 16:47, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ponyo WHAT!?!?!? I DIDN'T DO ANYTHING!!! Just because they tried to hack MY account doesn't mean that they're me!!! What the heck!?!?!?

WHAT!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!?!?

Okay, this has gotten out of hand, Ponyo. I DID NOT DO ANYTHING!!!!!!!! That's it, SCREW WIKIPEDIA!!! Not using this site again if this is how people treat other people here.

"screw you"
"Screw you"
"SCREW WIKIPEDIA"]
Excessive caps and use of ?!?!?!?. You're not doing yourself any favours if you're trying to convince anyone you're not the same person. You are extremely fortunate it is Friday and, as such, my mood was light enough to only block you for two weeks. If these types of shenanigans reoccur, you will be blocked indefinitely.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:28, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BUT I'M NOT THE SAME PERSON!!! That's just a coincidence! MetallicaMan800 (talk) 17:36, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:There Is No Game

Draft:There Is No Game, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:There Is No Game and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:There Is No Game during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 21:37, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Giuffria III cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Giuffria III cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:26, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 13:52, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Logan Paul

Hi, There are ways to voice your opinion but this place isn't one of those ways so kindly keep your comments off here, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 13:16, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Name A Yellow Fruit listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Name A Yellow Fruit. Since you had some involvement with the Name A Yellow Fruit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thegreatluigi (talk) 01:20, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TubeYou listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect TubeYou. Since you had some involvement with the TubeYou redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thegreatluigi (talk) 01:43, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Tube of You listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Tube of You. Since you had some involvement with the The Tube of You redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thegreatluigi (talk) 01:47, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Santa Cruz Games Logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Santa Cruz Games Logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 18:46, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ThatSkynyrdKid70 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ThatSkynyrdKid70. Since you had some involvement with the ThatSkynyrdKid70 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:47, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Crainer

Hello MetallicaMan800,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Crainer for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 Talk 19:09, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Prototype (band), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 03:37, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]