User talk:Mesopotamia/Archive2

Slaw. Ew katet bash. Ew ajamane le xora herasyan pe helenawm heshtek denusm lay deben. Estash chunete ser Ajam. Tikaye yarmetim de.

D iyako Talk + 13:52, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ew katet bash chawekem!

berasti amajet be shteki cuwan dawe. xaleket hengawt. ewe bo be biri min negeyshtbu! Xo ewe ecgar be kelkman de bo ewey bew ecememaney biselmenin ke eme erani nebuyn u nabin. Belam sebaret be serchawe bo wene le pirtukekani kesanek wek "Vasili Nikitin" (tenanet xo eranish niye!) Le ew pirukaney wa sebaret be kurdnasin le witekani berez Peshewa Qazi, hi Barzani...htw herweha u le zor shweni tir. Estash hendekim doziwetewe ba brek zor tir be ew kat ecemekan chirkeyan le naye!

Her biji! Her biji! Mesopotamia 14:28, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For example here. Mesopotamia 14:50, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Iranian peoples

You're actually missing the point with the article. The article doesn't exact homogeneity for the Iranian peoples and mostly emphasizes their similar languages, some historical ties, and some genetic ties that are tenuous in some cases. The article corresponds in its usage to the article on Germanic peoples, Slavic peoples, etc. I'm not quite sure what you mean by neutrally edit though. If you could explain your problems with the article better I might be able to address your concerns. The article is simply meant to explain the Iranian peoples as one type of categorization. The peoples articles on each group, such as Kurds, Pashtuns, etc. explain their regional variations. Tombseye 01:20, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is still no clear defination of who Iranian peoples are. I even never heard about it as it is claimed in the article. There are many differences and similarites among thos peoples (Pashtu, baluch, Fars...) who mentiond in the article, but it has not been clarified whether this relationship between/among for instance X and Z ethnic groups is which one: linguistically? ethnically? culturally? relgious? historically? etc...

As far as it is related to Kurdas (and maybe some other members in this mentioned group) Kurds are one of those who have least similarities and ties to other mentioned members in the group. So it must be considered, be clarified. Mesopotamia 01:34, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's actually not entirely known how different the Kurds are from the other Iranian peoples. For example, the Baluch speak a language that is the most similar to Kurdish. More comprehensive genetic testing may show that they are an offshoot of the Kurds. In addition, the article points out that regional variations exists. It is clear in its definition of the Iranian peoples as encompassing various aspects. In addition, if you read the genetic section the Kurdish background that is known (it's not entirely known as of yet) is explained as possibly the most distant from the other Iranian peoples. What more do you want at this point? The article can't simply be about the Kurds as there is already a Kurdish people article that I also helped contribute to and I was the one who put in the genetic studies about the Kurds that cluster them in many cases with peoples in the Caucasus that may point to an indigenous origin. Tombseye 02:01, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your clear respond. What I belive here is that the indigenious origin of the Kurds is being down-played. Iranians are only one of several different ancestors of the Kurds. Mesopotamia 02:10, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merhaba Biraye men.

to sani tirki nationalist dexasen bewen Administrator. adminship/Cool_Cat_3

Biraye men dange xo beden mera cemki aw tirk Cool Cat dexasa bewa Administrator.

ew tirk piri nationalista hun besanben aw tirk dexasa tane Kurdistan tenaba Biraye men Dange xo beden mera.Muhamed 18:59, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Silav, Dengdan hatiye wawi u ew ji ser neketiye. Spas ji te dikem ku we agadariye da min. Mesopotamia 23:38, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hewalo! Some Ajams are revandalising the Kurdish related pages. Tikaye were welamyan dewe! D iyako Talk + 18:49, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Giyano!

Checked. He does not pay attention to the content of edits and what does it mean. Wash neke le xotyani keyte dijber. Le sere xo be. Mesopotamia 23:24, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You broke rules and made more than 3 reverts and you will be blocked! And you make many attacks in Kurdish! You should be blocked for that too!

You are a vandalist. I am not breaking the rules, I just remove your vandalising. Mesopotamia 02:52, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Due to violation of the three revert rule, you have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. — FireFox • T • 12:10, 29 January 2006