User talk:Mertens21/Archive

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Pap3rw8 20:34, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article is about a COMPLETELY non-notable person. Also, refrain from the personal attacks ok? Wildthing61476 21:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to say it again, but online gamers are as a whole NOT NOTABLE, and do not meet the requirements listed in WP:BIO. There are very, VERY few that do fit this criteria at all. Wildthing61476 21:09, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can stop with the personal attacks (again) first of all. Secondly, if you believe they ARE worthy of inclusion, recreate the article. I will not tag it for speedy deletion, but instead send it to AfD where it can be debated. If a number of fellow Wikipedians agree that they are NOT notable enough for an article, then I hope you understand it's not personal against you or them. Wildthing61476 21:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not crying, I prefer to be civil and leave the personal attacks out of this. As for WHY I do this, simple I'm trying to help out here and oneof the ways to help is to tag articles that are need of being deleted. I CAN'T delete the articles, I'm not an admin, I'm merely pointing them out to the admin staff here. If an admin feels like the article is worthy, they can remove the tag. I have had a couple times in which that happened, or had the speedy modified into an AfD. You might want to talk to the admin who remvoed your article as to why they thought it was worth removing. Wildthing61476 21:26, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, if you are going to post the other article, I'll warn you ahead of time there's probably a good chance it'll be deleted. If you have other sources that verify his notability it might stay, but chances are it'll be deleted otherwise. You'd be surprised how many gaming clans/online gamers article are deleted from here on a regular basis. Wildthing61476 21:30, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:System of a Down

Whether you agree with a user's statements or not, the antagonistic tone of your post in Talk:System of a Down was unwarranted. Please review WP:CIVIL and Wikipedia:Etiquette, and please phrase future disagreements in a more constructive tone. -- H·G (^words/_works) 07:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 03:04, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bait removed

No disrespect intended but after seeing your response on User talk:Swimmerfreak94, I've removed the WP:BAIT placed on your talk page as inappropriate content. It appears you're aware of the discussion on ANI. Note this does not at all reflect on you. Best regards. Toddst1 (talk) 05:14, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your revert

You reverted my edit here My edit was not vandalism, it was a proper removal of a personal attack per WP:TALK. -Verdatum (talk) 15:08, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilink

I just did what I thought I needed to and remove an unreferenced piece of 2009 in music. I apologize, but there's absolutely no need to call me a dipshit; that was way out of line. Quit attacking people just because it makes you feel better. You keep doing it and it's gotten old. Stop it. 96.246.232.202 (talk) 04:21, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While 96.246.232.202's edit was not the best thing to do (look for a reference), it was still the right thing to do (removing unsourced information). It is, however, at no time acceptable to personally attack an editor. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. - kollision (talk) 06:13, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"I keep doing what?" Attacking people and using profanity while you do so. That's what you keep doing. You had no reason to attack that contributor; you just did it because you felt like it. Kollision is 100% correct here. 71.249.255.91 (talk) 13:12, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]