User talk:Merry Yellow

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Merry Yellow}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Please verify source of your statement

Pleas provide me attribution supporting your statement that a federal suit mentioned in the lester coleman article is "bogus" . I take issue with your claim. please either provide attribution or remove your comment. regards drlescoleman lescolemanlll@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drlescoleman (talk • contribs) 16:43, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is no official recognized lawsuit to which you refer. There is a Word document titled CASE No. 1:04 – CV – 01688 – EGS which purports to be a complaint filed on behalf of certain individuals. Unfortunately that document carries little provenance other than anonymous authorship and even less credibility as all .gov links directed to or through that document immediately lead to internet DNS Errors. Further pursuit of credibility for the many claims to which you allude lead through a labyrinth of nonsensical dead ends and appear to be little more than a waste of time. —Merry Yellow (talk) 12:04, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Am I missing something?

You're the same person as the blocked User:Anne Teedham, is that correct? --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 07:38, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I believe that (a) I have not been disruptive; (b) I have taken full responsibility for all issues related to sockpuppetry; (c) I have informed the full community that I am the same person as all of Anne Teedham's confirmed sockpuppets by using the Alternate Account and Master Account notification for each confirmed sockpuppet; (d) I apologize for any disruptions which I may have caused in general; (e) I am proud of my edits in Wikipedia; (f) and lastly, I accepted the block for a lengthy period of time by ceasing all activity within Wikipedia.

A made a mistake, and as I said I apologize.—Merry Yellow (talk) 13:36, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but you are still blocked, and that's not been resolved. I'm blocking this account; you'll need to ask to be unblocked from your original account, and the community will have to explicitly allow it. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 15:37, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You did not cease activity within Wikipedia for a lengthy period of time. User:Anne Teedham was blocked on March 15, 2009, and User: Merry Yellow was on Wikipedia on March 23, 2009. A total of 8 days, during that time one of your other sockpuppets may have been active. Not only that, you held conversations with yourself between your various sockpuppets to make it appear as though they were all separate persons [TC-Technical Consultant" article (Anson Ng) area] .Desertfae (talk) 20:40, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts: User:Anne Teedham. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. jpgordon^{::==( o )} 15:37, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]