User talk:Mercy kiai

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Mercy kiai. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 17:22, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Narayan Hulse (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Since the most recent decline, quite a bit of content has been added, including titles of five "notable publications" and five awards.

The claimed awards are

Castle Connolly Top Doctor – Castle Connolly does not agree.
America's Top Surgeons – sounds like a reality TV show, but is (allegedly) a recognition from the right-wing organisation Consumers' Research. Their website mentions no such award–and I doubt they'd give it to a surgeon in India, who according to his own website has never worked in the US.
Fellow of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons – that is not, as the draft claims, a prestigious honor that recognizes orthopedic surgeons who have made significant contributions to the field. See the AAOS website.
Patients' Choice Award – no explanation of where this award would come from.
Best Doctors in America – unexplained and unsourced, but again, he is not a doctor in America so is unlikely to be considered among the top 5% of doctors in the United State [sic].

As for the five claimed publications, those references are fake. The journals exist, and the issues were published in those years, but in three of the five issues specified, there is no article in that range of pages; J Shoulder Elbow Surg does have an article on pp352-357 in that issue but it's not the one mentioned here, and – worst of all – in Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med there is an article called "Femoroacetabular impingement: a review of diagnosis and management" in the specified issue, but neither of the co-authors named here is correct. Here it is.

It looks like the subject of the draft has hired a web marketing person with no scruples.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Narayan Hulse and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 18:08, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello Mercy kiai. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Dr Narayan Hulse, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mercy kiai. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mercy kiai|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 2A01:4C8:47:ADC4:4C07:52FF:FE0F:2817 (talk) 04:56, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Dr Narayan Hulse, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Mercy kiai, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mercy kiai|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 2A01:4C8:47:ADC4:4C07:52FF:FE0F:2817 (talk) 06:00, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I have not be paid to make any promotion for the Dr. Narayan Mercy kiai (talk) 06:14, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you create articles about him?

Where did you get the information you added here?

Whether you are being paid or not, you may not add promotional text to Wikipedia. --bonadea contributions talk 08:00, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Dr Narayan Hulse, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard.

You may edit the draft at Draft:Narayan Hulse and submit it for review when you think it is ready, but do not move it and do not create any other article or draft about him. bonadea contributions talk 07:11, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dr Narayan Hulse moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dr Narayan Hulse, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 05:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blake Boyd (Actor) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Blake Boyd (Actor), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:58, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:10, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:Mercy kiai/sandbox

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page User:Mercy kiai/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.facebook.com/developmentconsultants/photos/a.2095380880548220/2939797869439846/?type=3 and http://www.parliament.go.ke/the-national-assembly/national-assembly-minority-leader. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mercy kiai. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Courcelles (talk) 14:27, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]