User talk:Mentor1/sandbox

Feedback on your article

Hello group 30, Thank you for writing your article in your sandbox! I have read the article and would like to give some feedback to improve your article to Wikipedia standards and customs. While your tutor will judge it content wise, I will look if it meets the quality standards we have on Wikipedia. I standard look for a series of subjects that need improvement or are okay.

• Intro sentence/section: I am missing in your article a good intro sentence and section. In the intro sentence should be described what the subject is, a clear definition, summarising the whole article in short. Followed by one or more sentences that are still general but go a bit more in depth and give some info about for example the context of the subject.
• Links: Please look for much more keywords in your article and link them to other Wikipedia articles.
• Headers: Headers are needed in an article, because they provide readers structure and understanding what a section is about. Usually we start with headers with the second section. Look for other articles on Wikipedia how they have done this. Only use the standard way of making headers, as done in the many other Wikipedia articles.
• References: The common practise is to add a reference behind every two or three sentences.

Please add references behind the dot, without a space before the reference. Please also use the normal setup for references and add references directly after the dot of a sentence to source that sentence.

• Other: If you want to make a bulleted list, please use not • but a * at the beginning of the line, the software of Wikipedia automatically converts this to a nice dot. If you want to make a numbered list you can use a # at the beginning of the line. But most important: please look how other articles are set up, to see how your article should be written.

I hope you can implement this feedback to your sandbox article very soon. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 02:23, 28 May 2017 (UTC)