User talk:Menischt
July 2023
[edit]Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Hunter Biden. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 16:26, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Additionally, your practice of blanking this talkpage is counterproductive to communication, which is the purpose of use rtalkpages. Blanking it just creates an impression that you're trying to avoid communication. We generally assume that blanking means that you have read comments and understand them, not that you may ignore them. Acroterion (talk) 16:29, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- I did not attack anybody, this is a false claim! You are attacking me! —Menischt (talk) 16:51, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Menischt, I find these comments to be very unproductive/untrue, and they suggest a battleground attitude. In addition, it is high time you stop naming the children, especially in discussions about whether it is appropriate to name the children. In BLP matters it is important to err on the side of caution. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 20:51, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- I did not attack anybody, this is a false claim! You are attacking me! —Menischt (talk) 16:51, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
RfC
[edit]Hi Menischt, I see you are new here, and I'm not sure you understand what an RfC is. You don't need to start a new RfC on the Hunter Biden article, just add the the one I just started, either support or oppose. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:35, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Notice
[edit] You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.
SPECIFICO talk 22:36, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- I left the same notice yesterday, it was blanked, hence my comment above. Acroterion (talk) 23:20, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Menisct, you are closing in on a block for personal attacks, or for an arbitration enforcement sanction. Please reconsider you approach to editing Wikipedia and interactions with other editors. Acroterion (talk) 23:20, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Recent editing
[edit]Don't be discouraged by the politicisation / USA perspectives of most people on this website. Many of us appreciate the efforts of contributors like yourself. Personally I think its fine to respectfully name the granddaughter of a president when they've already received a large amount of prominent coverage. Regarding privacy issues, being on the front page of the NYT should indicate to any sensible person that the horse has bolted. You can always count on fierce adherence to rules in this place though. Unfortunately too many editors forget that we're here to build the greatest encyclopedia known to humanity; not to enforce particular narratives or favour certain perspectives. Keep up your great contributing
I recommend stepping away from that Hunter Biden thread for now. While I think your arguments are reasonable, you shouldn't count on being able to convince any of them of that fact Jack4576 (talk) 15:19, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- Concur with Jack. From your user page, it looks like you're not American. Public political discourse has gone off the rails there. See the talk page message I just left Jack4576. Be glad you've probably got an ocean between and the States.
- A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 17:34, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
December 2023
[edit]Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Economy of Suriname, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Under the descriptor “Statistics” shows where estimates begin "with IMF staff estimates for 2020–2028”. This style remains consistent for Economy article editing. Canada18 (talk) 22:11, 2 December 2023 (UTC)