User talk:Mendess55
Welcome
[edit]
|
If you want to contribute, then do it here. Reverting without a meaningful contribution to the discussion is not acceptable. In your case, the supposed references is in no way up to Wikipedia standards. -- Zz (talk) 13:15, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
June 2015
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Zeybeks, you may be blocked from editing. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 12:25, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. -- Zz (talk) 13:00, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- I have closed this, indicating I have told you about our edit warring policy. Now that you know, further edit warring may result in a block. --NeilN talk to me 22:55, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
June 2015
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Zeybeks. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 22:47, 16 June 2015 (UTC)