User talk:Mendeservesomelove

Welcome!

Hello, Mendeservesomelove, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Caucasian Heritage Month, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Crow^Caw 21:39, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Caucasian Heritage Month

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Caucasian Heritage Month requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Crow^Caw 21:39, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Heterosexual Pride Month

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Heterosexual Pride Month, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:42, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:42, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 21:44, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mendeservesomelove (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why doesn't my opinion count? Why does your opinion override my opinion? I'm very serious in my attempt to include everyone in these commemorative months. Don't abuse your power as a super wiki admin, there are other opinions in the world. Mendeservesomelove (talk) 21:50, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia isn't for stuff that you made up. PhilKnight (talk) 22:09, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

I don't know if I'm a super wiki admin, but I'll take the compliment. First, it's not a matter of anyone's opinion. Obviously you made that shit up; these things aren't notable. They don't pass the WP:GNG, the criteria for notability, because they don't exist. They also don't pass the smell test, these things that advocate straight whiteness in fairly distasteful manner, which makes me think you're only here for a kind of activism usually reserved for Facebook comments. Happy days, Drmies (talk) 22:04, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mendeservesomelove (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Someone made up LGBT History Month until it stuck. Someone has to make up everything. Clearly Wikipedia is biased against white straight males. If the comment back would have been make it more professional, or needs more detail, or something constructive, as the resolve disputes page says, talk to the disagreeing party, I would be happy to discuss. But someone just pushes their opinion over the top of mine, because clearly theirs is more correct than mine. Mendeservesomelove (talk) 22:12, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The point is, they didn't make it up here. You are missing the point. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place for activism. Yamla (talk) 22:16, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.