User talk:HistoryofAryavart

Welcome!

Hello, Melechha, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Battle of Umberkhind, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! DanCherek (talk) 04:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Battle of Umberkhind

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Battle of Umberkhind has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://archive.org/stream/in.ernet.dli.2015.32141/2015.32141.New-History-Of-The-Marathas--Vol1_djvu.txt. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. DanCherek (talk) 04:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So I have to write everything on my own? And can you assure me that after it my article will be published or there are still some issues that needed to be fixed? Melechha (talk) 14:21, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Umberkhind has been accepted

Battle of Umberkhind, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 02:15, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have re-draftified Battle of Umberkhind, and the page is now located at Draft:Battle of Umberkhind. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 15:24, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Melechha (talk) 15:42, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Battle of Bidar has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Battle of Bidar. Thanks! Deb (talk) 07:43, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Uruli

Hello Melechha,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Battle of Uruli for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Battle of Uruli to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

- 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 20:15, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello Melechha! Your additions to Siege of Ponda have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — SamX [talk · contribs] 19:02, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I got it Melechha (talk) 20:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Battle of Sangamner shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Additionally, accusing other good-faith editors of vandalism is inappropriate and may be considered a personal attack. — SamX [talk · contribs] 01:10, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So what is the solution? If I have primary sources which is backing my point and other editors don't have it and just reverting my edits without giving any citation to bolster their changes then how this is fair? Melechha (talk) 07:09, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Consider this a homework assignment on which hinges your unblocking. The solution is right there before you. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:13, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of vani

Hey Melechha,thank you for your contribution on page Battle of Vani Aryan330 (talk) 02:31, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Very welcome Melechha (talk) 12:55, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Vani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mughal. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. — SamX [talk · contribs] 21:57, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Shirwal (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Shirwal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:58, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Melechha! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:58, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Umrani (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Umrani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 21:06, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Asking

Hello @Melechha as you said in talk page of SamX that the user ThePakistanihistorian have multiple accounts,so can you tell which is another account from where he is editing for making sockpuppet investigation Aryan330 (talk) 02:20, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@عبدالرحمن4132 here is the alt of user @ThePakistanihistorian Melechha (talk) 08:26, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

that's not me, that once again comes under false allegations, it's quite clear that aryan330 and you are the same people who are arguing with me, even the moderator pointed this out. ThePakistanihistorian (talk) 09:46, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ThePakistanihistorian at where moderator pointed out?

Even asking someone for it you are considering arguing then what I can tell further!

Everyone have the right for investigation if he doubts & I just asked him because as he mentioned that you are the sock then I have to ask him that at what basis he is telling that you are sock?I mean which is another account for he is saying this?Aryan330 (talk) 09:49, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No admin had accused me that my alt is @Aryan330 Admins can easily find out by checking out the IP. Melechha (talk) 10:04, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Melechha That what I told him,but I don't know what he trying to say & on what basis! Aryan330 (talk) 10:05, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

wasn't samX talking abt it? ThePakistanihistorian (talk) 10:07, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am tired by replying,now I don't want to waste my time.@ThePakistanihistorian if you are having a issue,you can ask for sock puppet investigation. But please don't disturb me again if you are going to talk the same again and again.

Closing the discussion. Aryan330 (talk) 10:11, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly the same, I'm bored of dealing with your arguments without any structured base, let's close this discussion. ThePakistanihistorian (talk) 10:19, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ThePakistanihistorian without any structured base, As i said earlier words and statements like this cannot prove us as guilty and you as a innocent.

Closing the discussion. Aryan330 (talk) 11:12, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not trying to make yourself look guilty. ThePakistanihistorian (talk) 17:35, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Melechha. Thank you. — SamX [talk · contribs] 07:21, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siege of Panhala 1690 (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siege of Panhala 1690 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:17, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Courcelles (talk) 15:12, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I have closed the Arbitration Enforcement thread with a recommendation that Should [this user] seek an unblock, it is recommended that this be conditional on a topic ban from the Mughal–Maratha Wars and demonstrating an understanding of what vandalism is. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 02:15, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dogra–Tibetan War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zorawar Singh.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #77332

is closed. User needs to request renaming and unblocking by placing

{{unblock-un|new username|your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of this talk page.

Probably a WP:partial block from Mughal–Maratha Wars to match that of the other member of the tag team might be in order as an unblock condition. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:09, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Knowing what to do instead of edit warring should probably be an unblock condition. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:12, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The sock8ng would also need to stop for a good while. Caught them socking again. Courcelles (talk) 03:20, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And I’m seeing hints they account might have been User:Mewad mafia the whole time. Courcelles (talk) 03:21, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, This guy is not my sock account Melechha (talk) 11:15, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Courcelles thanks for giving permission to edit my own talk page Melechha (talk) 11:15, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request for renaming and unblocking my account

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

HistoryofAryavart (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

aryaputram7 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Hey @Courcelles: and other Wiki moderators/administrators I hope you all are doing well, I'm here to appeal for unblocking my account. In past days I disrupted Wikipedia and instead of contributing more for it, I was engaged in a edit war, I'm apologizing for everything what I did from vandalism to disrupting this encyclopedia and also I'm apologizing for my username violation (which was racist for non Indians), But now I'm assuring you that I have learnt from my mistakes and reasons for my block and I am very determinant that I will not engage in future edit warring or any kind of disruption if I got unblocked. I am very much interested in expanding wikipedia with proper facts and sources, please understand that the block is no longer necessary because I have understood what I was blocked for, and I won't do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead as I have deep interest in history. Kindly review my unblock request. Thankyou Wikipedia for this platform. Melechha (talk) 11:25, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I suppose the new username is fine; I'll leave it to someone more knowledgeable in Indian culture to say. But there are allegations that you've used other accounts in the discussion thread above that you didn't address here. Nor did you indicate explicit acceptance of the conditions outlined above. — Daniel Case (talk) 11:58, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah my bad. I did sockpuppetry from only these accounts:

@Melechha2 @EditorPandit

Now I have understood the implications of doing sockpuppetry and now I can assure you that I will only use this @Melechha account to contribute for Wikipedia. @Daniel Case and other moderators now please consider to unblock me Melechha (talk) 14:10, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you post a new unblock request, you'll get more attention (I cannot review it because I've already reviewed this last one). Daniel Case (talk) 15:29, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Courcelles: on this one. Daniel Case (talk) 15:30, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ohk. And can you tell me about my more cons which still I have to fix them? Melechha (talk) 21:33, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Konkan (October 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Phuzion was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Konkan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Phuzion (talk) 19:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Tiruvadi (October 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Phuzion was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Tiruvadi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Phuzion (talk) 19:30, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maratha invasion of Burhanpur (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by QueerEcofeminist were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maratha invasion of Burhanpur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

QueerEcofeminist🌈 06:01, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Bidar (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See comments of reviewer Deb. The lede sentence should say that the battle was in India and what part of India it was in.

There is a history of sockpuppetry associated with this draft. If this draft is resubmitted, please check the history and determine whether the submitter is quacking. If so, please take appropriate action, which may include filing a follow-up sockpuppet investigation.

This does not mean that the topic is not notable, and it does not mean that the topic is notable. If this draft is resubmitted by a neutral good-faith reviewer, it may be reviewed and accepted based on its content and sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Bidar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:26, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Umberkhind (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tutwakhamoe was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Umberkhind and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 21:41, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maratha invasion of Malwa (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Turnagra were:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article is not written in the tone needed for a wikipedia article, lacks a lede, and could use extra context around the events described to help people unfamiliar with the topic.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maratha invasion of Malwa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Turnagra (talk) 20:32, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siege of Panhala 1692-1694 has been accepted

Siege of Panhala 1692-1694, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:19, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Shirwal

Hello, Melechha. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Shirwal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Umrani

Hello, Melechha. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Umrani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Siege of Panhala 1690

Hello, Melechha. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siege of Panhala 1690, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Nandi

Hello, Melechha. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Nandi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Dungom

Hello, Melechha. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Dungom, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting for renaming and unblocking my account

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

HistoryofAryavart (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Indianhistoryenjoyer7 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

It's been 5 months since my block I was blocked for sock puppetry and username violation (which is a derogatory slur to non Indians) I should have read the username policy before choosing such a racist word as my username. Now I understand what are the serious repercussions of violating username policy therefore I am also requesting to change my username. I was also blocked for sock puppetry which I did during the months of July 2023-September 2023 with these accounts- User:Melechha2, User:Wikihistoryedito and User:EditorPandit. I admit I made blunders and I apologize for violating Wikipedia's rules. The reason for my use of sockpuppets was to avoid and pre-empt time consuming conflicts with a particular editor. I recognize that conflicts and disputes will be inevitable on certain Wikipedia articles, and that the only way to deal with it is by respectfully presenting your views/point out any issues on the talk page, consider any disputing editors' arguments and concerns, and to arrive at a consensus with them even if it may be an arduous and time consuming process. During my first two months here, I definitely had issues with my personal conduct and temperament. I had a tendency to be snide to other editors who challenged my version of an article [4] and was resistant to valid concerns regarding content disputes and my handling of dispute resolutions. I look back at my behavior during this period and am ashamed of lashing out at other editors, I've done some serious self introspection during the past few months by reading all the wikipedia rules and regulations thoroughly and I'm very certain that my behaviour during this period will remain a thing of the past. I have made several constructive edits and articles here (Battle of Uruli, Siege of Panhala 1692-1694 and Battle of Mandalgarh) and I have generally used proper methods like drafting and referencing better quality sources so please consider unblocking me and I can assure that I will follow Wikipedia rules and I will apologize to every editor whom I affronted here especially in the Talk: Battle of Sangamner, abiding by a personal 1RR (1 revert rule) policy where if anyone reverts my edit, to immediately present my point of view/point out any issues on the talk page and use outside mediation/resolution noticeboards if necessary rather than reverting, adding or deleting content until a consensus is reached. If a similar situation arises where I feel like I'm being unfairly targeted by another editor, I plan to patiently and respectfully discuss with them on the talk pages of articles regardless of how uncomfortable it may get, rather than the use of subterfuge or socks. I am asking to be unblocked as per WP:LASTCHANCE or an conditional unblock if admins deem it necessary.Melechha (talk) 05:45, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Confirmed evasion as Indianhistoryenjoyer0. As you are continuing to violate WP:EVADE and WP:SOCK, there's no way anyone will lift the block at this time. Your best bet is to stop evading your block and go at least six months with zero edits, then apply under WP:SO. At this time, you are far closer to a ban than you are to being unblocked. Yamla (talk) 11:17, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla I'm ashamed for this and I have stopped evading blocks. Also I have a question. Can I work in hi-wiki, Wikimedia and Wikibooks to show that I can improve? Because I don't want to just sit in waiting the six months out, without making any contributions to other Wikipedia projects. Melechha (talk) 18:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your block only applies to en.wikipedia. You are not blocked on any other wikimedia project and are free to edit there. --Yamla (talk) 21:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks for replying Yamla. I asked to make sure that I don't evade my block any further. I'll start working on other Wikipedia projects and then apply for another unblock request after 3 months, thanks again and stay safe. Melechha (talk) 22:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

HistoryofAryavart (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have sincerely waited for another 6 months to get unblocked and I want to keep this perseverance for good, I had already acknowledged the mistakes in my previous request which led to my block. Which were: Racist username (not anymore), avoiding 3RR rule and further evading block with sockpuppets. But please understand that I now understand the consequences of all of my deeds done in the past, I'll start a whole new Wikipedia journey from now on and learn from the mistakes I have made, I am applying under WP:SO and seek a 2nd chance. Regards.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have sincerely waited for another 6 months to get unblocked and I want to keep this perseverance for good, I had already acknowledged the mistakes in my previous request which led to my block. Which were: 
Racist username (not anymore), avoiding 3RR rule and further evading block with sockpuppets. But please understand that I now understand the consequences of all of my deeds done in the past, I'll start a whole new Wikipedia journey from now on and learn from the mistakes I have made, I am applying under [[WP:SO]] and seek a 2nd chance. Regards. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have sincerely waited for another 6 months to get unblocked and I want to keep this perseverance for good, I had already acknowledged the mistakes in my previous request which led to my block. Which were: 
Racist username (not anymore), avoiding 3RR rule and further evading block with sockpuppets. But please understand that I now understand the consequences of all of my deeds done in the past, I'll start a whole new Wikipedia journey from now on and learn from the mistakes I have made, I am applying under [[WP:SO]] and seek a 2nd chance. Regards. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have sincerely waited for another 6 months to get unblocked and I want to keep this perseverance for good, I had already acknowledged the mistakes in my previous request which led to my block. Which were: 
Racist username (not anymore), avoiding 3RR rule and further evading block with sockpuppets. But please understand that I now understand the consequences of all of my deeds done in the past, I'll start a whole new Wikipedia journey from now on and learn from the mistakes I have made, I am applying under [[WP:SO]] and seek a 2nd chance. Regards. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

HistoryofAryavart (talk) 14:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)}}[reply]

Checkuser technical data shows no evidence of recent block evasion. It's a noisy range, but I would be rather surprised if any recent block evasion had taken place here. --Yamla (talk) 17:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there's no block evasion done in past 6 months if you check thoroughly. HistoryofAryavart (talk) 18:02, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain some of the constructive edits you'd like to make? I'd be inclined to unblock, provided you accept a topic ban on the Maratha Confederacy, broadly construed (so nothing about wars they were involved with). Elli (talk | contribs) 15:24, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying, I can make constructive edits for any Indian history related articles except Maratha Confederacy ofcourse, but to be specific I'd like to do edits in Gupta Empire related articles. HistoryofAryavart (talk) 16:37, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Elli: I think this answer is fine. I would also be inclined to accept a conditional unblock with a topic ban from Maratha Confederacy, broadly construed. Best, House Blaster (talk • he/they) 16:11, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, yeah. Courcelles do you have any objection here? Or are you good with an unblock with the topic-ban. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:28, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Shirwal

Hello, Melechha. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Shirwal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:50, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Umrani

Hello, Melechha. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Umrani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Siege of Panhala 1690

Hello, Melechha. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Siege of Panhala 1690".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:21, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Nandi

Hello, Melechha. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Nandi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Dungom

Hello, Melechha. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Dungom".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Kudal

Hello, Melechha. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Kudal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Konkan

Hello, Melechha. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Konkan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Tiruvadi

Hello, Melechha. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Tiruvadi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Maratha invasion of Burhanpur

Hello, Melechha. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maratha invasion of Burhanpur, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:04, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Kudal

Hello, Melechha. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Kudal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:53, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Konkan

Hello, Melechha. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Konkan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Tiruvadi

Hello, Melechha. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Tiruvadi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Maratha invasion of Burhanpur

Hello, Melechha. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Maratha invasion of Burhanpur".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:55, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Maratha invasion of Malwa

Hello, HistoryofAryavart. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maratha invasion of Malwa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:05, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Maratha invasion of Malwa

Hello, HistoryofAryavart. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Maratha invasion of Malwa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:14, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Bidar

Hello, HistoryofAryavart. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Bidar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:06, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]