User talk:Melcsw

The article on NVP is clearly biased and should not be allowed on WP. If submitted as a school essay, the author would fail to get a passing grade.

It is obviously written with the clear aim of advocating a certain opinion of NVP. As many talk contributors have noted before me the purpose of an article on WP is to present a balanced, informed and correct description of the subject in question, not to advocate a certain opinion.

The article does not achieve any of the above purposes. The article does not present in any way the ideas of NVP. Rather, it contains a disproportionate criticism section referencing POVs of certain authors as facts. It lacks useful and/or reliable information NVP, his books and achievements. Understandably, adept contributors are unwilling to submit useful contributions as the original and partisan author apparently removes all changes not supporting his POV.

If the author were receptible to any input, the author would easily acknowledge that none of the talk contributors have supported the article in its current form. On the contrary, the contributors have generally criticised the article. The author refuses to accept valid information concerning NVP. Rather, the author chooses to present opinions as facts.

I propose that the article is removed altogether as it is biased, unbalanced and lacks relevant information. Matjuv (talk) 13:03, 4 September 2009 (UTC)