User talk:MelchiorG

Welcome!

Hello, MelchiorG, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:01, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome and thanks

Hello MelchiorG, welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed the new article you created Root system of a semi-simple Lie algebra, thanks for that and thanks also for updating Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics/PlanetMath Exchange/17-XX Nonassociative rings and algebras (notice the tweak I made to your edit there: [1])

Since you are a new editor I want to welcome you to the project and let you know about some things you might be interested in. First of all there is Wikipedia's Mathematics project Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics for which the central discussion point is located here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics. Please feel free to join in on any of the discussions there, or start your own. The atmosphere is quite collegial and friendly. You might also be interested in adding your name here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics/Participants. Also as you have already discovered, the Mathematics project has a subproject of its own: Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics/PlanetMath Exchange. That project has been a bit moribund for awhile, but if you want to help there your contributions will be appreciated and you may even inspire me to start contributing there again ;-)

Finally if you have any questions, I'm happy to help. Regards, Paul August ☎ 16:25, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Style issues

Hello. Please notice my edits to two of the articles you've recently created. I've brought them closer to the norms of Wikipedia:Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (mathematics). You were using too many capital letters in article titles and section headings and neglecting some of the basic mathematical notation style conventions.

Also, "Let g be a Lie algebra over a field K." is an inappropriate opening sentence; it fails to tell the lay reader, among other things, that mathematics is what the article is about. Michael Hardy (talk) 16:41, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, thanks for helping out. MelchiorG (talk) 15:04, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lie bialgebroids has been accepted

Lie bialgebroids, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 21:56, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Think: A Compelling Introduction to Philosophy

The article Think: A Compelling Introduction to Philosophy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 20:48, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: I don't remember having written the article. Maybe somebody (the author?) has hacked my account at that time. I have since changed the password and not noticed further strange activities. I agree that the article does not have a relevance section and not even a description of the book's content. It is thus not a good contribution to the wikipedia and I agree to its deletion. MelchiorG (talk) 22:08, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is a similar suspicious article: Atheism:_The_Case_Against_God which I haven't created. Please feel free to delete that as well as it also has no summary and only one reference to a review. MelchiorG (talk) 22:29, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Index of a Lie algebra moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Index of a Lie algebra, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. funplussmart (talk) 16:36, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It looks as if somebody has extended a bit on the article. In its current state it has at least 2 references. So I believe that leaving it in the public space with a state somewhere between stub and starter article is plausible. MelchiorG (talk) 15:02, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]