User talk:Mel Carter/Textbook 2 Edit Sandbox
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
[edit]Name of student reviewer: Christina geo
Date of review: 5/15/13
Name of editor: User:Mel_Carter
URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mel_Carter
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page:
Date review submitted to instructor: 5/15/13
Length of edit (too long/too short): Perfect length
Image (needed/appropriate): not needed
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Yes
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes
Wikiformatting: Correct formatting
Grammar & composition: Great grammar and composition
Other comments: Very nice format, clear, and straight to the point
--Christina geo (talk) 00:07, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
| Name of student reviewer ** | Wikipedia User: Angela Sandy |
|---|---|
| Date of review | 5/5/2013 |
| Name of editor | Wikipedia User: Mel_Carter |
| URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mel_Carter |
| Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 5/16/2013 |
| Date review submitted to instructor | 5/16/2013 |
| Length of edit (too long/too short) | The length of the article is good |
| Image (needed/appropriate) | Not necessary |
| Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | Textbook information is accurate. |
| Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | n/a |
| Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | Info accurate for I/O Psych |
| Wikiformatting | The format is good |
| Grammar & composition | Well done |
| Other comments | Might want to add some more info for more credit. |