User talk:Meio
Welcome!
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia, Meio! I am Jojhutton and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
Jojhutton (talk) 12:59, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Repeated Undoes on Automotive Superlatives Page
[edit]I spent hours and hours reorganizing and fixing format on the Automotives Superlatives page and you continue your acts of apparent vandalism. Each time I undo those acts I offer succinct but detailed reasons and you pretend I have offered no justification when you undo my corrections on the edit page. You have yet to offer even one coherent sentence for why you are making the changes you have made. Moreover the format of your changes is completely inconsistent with the entire section and is inconsistent with Wikipedia practice (or any practice). (Moreover it is extremely sloppy.) If you want to make a change pease make it a small one and offer a justification. Thank You. Sadowski (talk) 01:00, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
- I noticed your last addition to the talk page at the Automotives Superlatives page. Which makes much of the above untrue, so I apologize. If the Ford Super Duty page describes it as a commercial vehicle it should not. It is marketed as both noncommercial and commercial and is widely used as a noncommercial vehicle. I think you have a point concerning the International CXT however. Although it has a history of noncommercial use it was "constructed principally" as a commercial vehicle. And I have verified that the Unimog Brabus U500 Black Edition is still currently manufactured. and I shall make edits to correct for both facts.Sadowski (talk) 18:16, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- Since the US definition of commercial is so fuzzy I am thinking perhaps we should focus on marketing. In which case the CXT should be considered commercial and the Ford Super Duty qualifies as noncommercial. What do you think? And if that's the case perhaps the list of criteria should be clarified to make that more explicit. Sadowski (talk) 18:55, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- In particular I am thinking about criteria #1 which says "are constructed principally for retail sale to consumers, for their personal use, and to transport people on public roads (no commercial or industrial vehicles are eligible)." I think the problem is with the word "constructed principally." In my opinion this is simply too vague and is open to interpretation. For example the Ford Super Duty, the Dodge Ram 3500 and the GMC Sierra/Chevrolet Silverado 3500 are marketed for both purposes, and I honestly don't think it's possible to determine the proportion which are sold for each. Thus I suggest replacing the phrase"constructed principally" with the word "marketed." I think this is a more concrete critera as all manufacturers seem to purposefully market their vehicles.
- Since the US definition of commercial is so fuzzy I am thinking perhaps we should focus on marketing. In which case the CXT should be considered commercial and the Ford Super Duty qualifies as noncommercial. What do you think? And if that's the case perhaps the list of criteria should be clarified to make that more explicit. Sadowski (talk) 18:55, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- By the way if we can reach a concensus I would be happy to make the changes myself.(In fact I would prefer to do it myself as I am concerned about the format.) Sadowski (talk) 19:32, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ultima Evolution, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://wn.com/Ultima_GTR_640_-_kit-to-car_build_in_six_minutes.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:49, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Ultima production numbers
[edit]Do you have any idea where I could source something regarding productions numbers from Ultima? Spacecowboy420 (talk) 06:59, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Not without doing a Google search no. Sorry. Meio (talk) 12:32, 7 October 2016 (UTC)