User talk:Meiamme

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Talk:Penis has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Trusilver 03:29, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Cunnilingus constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Trusilver 03:31, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:NOTCENSORED#Wikipedia_is_not_censored. Dreadstar † 03:33, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to post disruptive comments on sexuality related pages, you will be blocked. As noted above, Wikipedia is not censored, period. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:39, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pornography Laws

This is going to sound rather blunt, but you really need to stop editing articles to reflect what you (incorrectly) believe to be against the law. Calm down, read the link provided by Dreadstar above, and then figure out how you can contribute to Wikipedia in a constructive fashion. As of right now, you're just creating messes that others need to clean up.Basket548 (talk) 03:43, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Its illegal to supply porn to children

Why do you think all the porn sites ask for verification of age? You are putting porn where children can access it, thats against the law in the USA!--Meiamme (talk) 03:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You clearly understand neither the law nor this site. Take some time to actually research the law, and post your findings here. Until then, you will most likely be banned if you continue to pursue a single incorrect agenda on Wikipedia.Basket548 (talk) 03:52, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you failed to answer the question Thats because its not inline with your arguement. Why do you think all the porn sites ask for verification of age?

Wiki is not seperate to law, it must obey USA law.

Ok ill put it in the hands of organisations who do know the law.--Meiamme (talk) 03:55, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia as long as the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you believe that a legal action is warranted, you may contact our information team at info-en@wikimedia.org and they may forward it to our legal counsel or a more appropriate venue. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Trusilver 03:58, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Meiamme (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Didnt like the point wiki is breaking the law, claiming it is not, so why is he so upset im going to talk to organisations who know the law? If wiki is not breaking the law, I will find out from the organisatsion after doing research he asked me to do! Why am I banned because I did what his friend said to do? Wikis No legal threat page is clearly for civil matters and does not exclude criminal, which is what this would be anyway. I have not reverted the changes after It was changed back.

Decline reason:

No valid unblock reason given. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 04:29, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

See WP:LEGAL. Dreadstar † 04:26, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]