User talk:Mehrshad2020
Violence against men
[edit]I just want to let you know that I've reverted your addition to the Violence against men article as I can't verify that the sources describe it as "violence against men", which would fall under WP:SYNTH. If I made a mistake do let me know. Your contributions are much appreciated however, so feel free to add it to the circumcision article or one that about opposition to it. Happy editing! —Panamitsu (talk) 22:03, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Greetings and respect. Thank you for your kindness. The sources I have mentioned for this post are completely related to it. Both in his article and in his book, Mr. Ahmady considers male circumcision as violence against them. Mr. Gregory J. Boyle also clearly considers circumcision to be violence against humans and a violation of their right to decide about their identity.
- In the continuation of the text, I will leave the relevant links so that you can read the sources carefully.
- Kameel Ahmady. CULTURAL PATHOLOGY OF MALE CIRCUMCISION IN IRAN: FOCUSING ON CHILDREN’S RIGHTS AND THE RIGHT TO THE BODY
- Kameel Ahmadys book: Blade of Tradition in the Name of Religion. p 284
- Mr. Gregory J. Boyle's Article: Circumcision of healthy boys: Criminal assault? Mehrshad2020 (talk) 12:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for providing these sources to me again. I see that they describe it as "violence against children" (it'd be great if you added your text to an article about violence against children article!), but not specifically "violence against men". We usually want that exact phrase to be used in the sources to prevent any thought about it being original research. Do you know of any sources which specifically say "violence against men"? —Panamitsu (talk) 22:12, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Skybehzad10 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aria1990. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. DatGuyTalkContribs 04:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.