User talk:Megabytehertz

Changes to page on the Bioinitiative Report - take to Talk page

You have made again some changes to the article on the Bioinitiative Report. The text for the article, which is tagged as a "controversial article", was achieved after much passionate debate, but had been stable for some time. Your changes introduce real changes to the meaning of the article, with which I and I suspect other editors might disagree. In such cases, it is wise to make your case for these changes on an article's Talk Page and to build a consensus for them before they are implemented in the actual article (for more on how to use Talk pages, see this Help article on Talk Pages). I invite you to make your case for the changes you wish on the Bioinitiative Report article's Talk page. --papageno (talk) 22:39, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making changes to the Bioinitiative Report article unless you have first achieved consensus for them on the article's talk page. Without doing so, further edits may be viewed in bad faith. --papageno (talk) 17:20, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your continued edits to the Bioinitiative Report article are unproductive. Please discuss any changes first on the article's talk page. I will consider further such edits without discussion as disruptive editing. --papageno (talk) 22:36, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I and others (Hadolaven (talk · contribs), 93.136.33.83 (talk · contribs)) have reverted the same edits you have made several more times. These edits are unsourced; have not been discussed on the article's Talk page, despite polite requests here on your talk page to do so; and do not reflect a consensus view of editors of the Bioinitiative Report article. I regret that any further attempts to make similar changes will be considered disruptive editing, and will cause me to initiate a request to an administrator of an incident (ANI). --papageno (talk) 11:25, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bioinitiative Report was changed by Megabytehertz (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86791 on 2013-01-26T21:19:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:19, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 21:22, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]