User talk:Mega Man 5

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to RE4, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --00:12, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
We know who you are, 198.53.60.60! You've been warned, please stop.

I wasn't hiding anything, so you kinda self-owned yourself there.

I have decided to stop posting information in the Resident Evil 4 page. So, you might as well quit what you're doing.- Mega Man 5

Image copyright problem with Image:Sdk2cartridge.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sdk2cartridge.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:50, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Rcpro.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rcpro.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 03:05, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

During the Super Paper Mario debacle, I lost my cool. While I should have and could have controlled my temper and not make sarcastic and/or rude comments, I did anyway, so I apologize. - A Link to the Past (talk) 19:24, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, right. You're just all happy "and apologetic" because the game was released on your beloved Wii.-Mega Man 5 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Wii incompatibility

I noticed that you changed the word "incompatible" with "not compatible". Keep in mind that grammatical postitives are preferred in encyclopedia entries. For example, "a circle is not square" would be replaced by "a circle is round". If you have any comments on the issue, please contact me. Just64helpin 20:43, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I recently changed more than just that. But why change it in the first place? When the "not compatible/incombatibility" portion of the article first appeared, it said not compabtible with four of the GameCube's accessories. Then the wording was changed shortly after (not compatible to incompatible, for example), but all meant exactly what I had contributed earlier. Why change the wording? There was nothing wrong with what I had contributed earlier (when the not compatible portion first appeared in the article), because my original wording was readable and made sense, and the Wii not being compatible with those accessories is a pure fact. So why not just leave it?-Mega Man 5 4 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure why you neglected to post in my talk page. Anyways, "incompatible" means "not compatible". Readers tend to glance over the "not" bit and go straight to "compatible". I've trimmed the prose avoid this issue altogether. Please also keep in mind that "adaptor" redirects to "adapter". Just64helpin 21:39, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. So, there was no need to change the wording in the first place.-Mega Man 5 4 May 2007 (UTC)

The point is that "adapter" is the correct word and should be used. Just64helpin 21:44, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I changed it to adapter. Now leave my contribution.Mega Man 5 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Your contribution states the same thing twice. Please avoid doing this. Just64helpin 21:53, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong, I changed "adaptor" to "adapter" which is what you said should be used. There was nothing wrong with my wording, and in the end your contribution means exactly what I had contributed the first time. Avoid changing it, Just64helpin. It doesn't need to be changed.Mega Man 5 4 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm aware of the warning, so quit spamming my talk page Harlock jds.-Mega Man 5 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Ratatouille (video game) image reverts

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. TheRealFennShysa 21:32, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice try - 198.53.60.60 is you, based on this edit. Heading over to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR now. Have a nice day! TheRealFennShysa 21:45, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, I was not hiding anything. I've been told to log in, and I have been. So, you just self-owned yourself TheRealFennShysa. Have a good one! Mega Man 5 4 May 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked for 24 hours for violating 3RR at Wii. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 22:46, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am free to post in my talk page, however, and I have not been banned.-Mega Man 5 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Just FYI, all non-abusive blocked users have the right to edit their talk page. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 22:50, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but it also means I have not been blocked completely. In addition, I'm not banned from Wikipedia.-Mega Man 5 4 May 2007 (UTC)

And if you keep up disrupting Wikipedia and trolling, you will be "blocked completely." --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 22:56, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, but it seems like you want me to be banned from Wikipedia. But I'm not banned, that's a fact.-Mega Man 5 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Wii compatibility.

Please stop saying that the Wii is 'incompatible' with gamecube stickers. Please keep in mind you've already been banned once for violating 3RR -- Phoeba Wright^OBJECTION! 08:45, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I was going to do anyway if everyone still said the information I contributed shouldn't remain. And that is still what everyone's saying, so the below warning isn't necessary. Also, I was never banned from this site. I was blocked from editing articles for 24 hours once, and that is it.-Mega Man 5 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Banning and blocking are sweet potatoes and yams. I'm just letting you know that you're in danger of crossing 3RR again, I have nothing to do withthe below comment -- Phoeba Wright^OBJECTION! 03:59, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Potatoes and Yams? What does do those have to do with this? Well okay, whatever. I'll leave you alone now.-Mega Man 5 19 May 2007 (UTC)

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. Harlock jds 10:50, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I put the warning here (again) because you (once again) did more than 3 reverts on the same edit. Stop doing that and you'll stop getting the warnings.Harlock jds 04:41, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But you don't need to keep re-posting the one you gave me over a week ago.-Mega Man 5 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Actually yes i do since it was a warning about a different page than the other one.Harlock jds 13:56, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to. We're going to leave it at that.-Mega Man 5 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Gamecube.

Nintendo no longer manufactures Gamecube. Therefore it should be considered obsolete. There are no new Gamecube games coming out for the system. Nintendo's focus is on Wii and Ds. Only retailers sell the few remaning Gameboy games and Game Cube.

You're wrong. Nintendo has confirmed multiple times that they still manufacture the GameCube [1][2][3], Madden NFL 08 will be released for the GC next month[4], and most retailers still sell GC hardware[5][6][7], software, and accessories[8][9][10]. Therefore, the system is not obsolete and Nintendo is not focusing completely on Wii and DS. These are facts. Accept them. Mega Man 5 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Please stop making revisions to Nintendo Gamecube Your actions are in violation of WP:3RR Asher196 05:38, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop. Your sources are not reliable, and neither are the sales of the Xbox and GC. The three sources provided have the latest official information regarding the sales (shipments for PS2) of the sixth generation systems, and are far more reliable. Therefore they need to be left, and you need to stop. Mega Man 5 29 October 2007 (UTC)

I have twice provided reliable third party sources (Yahoo News and Wedbush Morgan Securities) I'm sorry if you disagree with their reporting. Asher196 05:56, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I included sources that have been used in the article for several months. The ones with figures for PS2 and GC come direct from Sony and Nintendo, so they are official, correct, and more reliable, and did not need to be replaced. The Xbox source is from Game Daily, but is accurate. How? The information, while on Game Daily's site, comes from someone who works at Microsoft who states that the system has sold over 24 million. I'm sure many would trust someone at Microsoft over Yahoo News. Mega Man 5 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Mmx3satcover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Mmx3satcover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 10:15, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mega Man 5 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Richiekim 07:10, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bbgccover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bbgccover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 01:54, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mmx3satcover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Mmx3satcover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 03:16, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mmb&ccoverart.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Mmb&ccoverart.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 03:43, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Pmwrgc.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Pmwrgc.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 23:02, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Act52.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Act52.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 13:25, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]