User talk:Meeslow
The article Risk 2210 AD – Terror Tactics Command Deck has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Zero assertion of notability - seems to be a small, unofficial deck of cards available for sale from a fansite. Passing mention in Risk 2210 A.D. seems sufficient.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 09:48, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
The article Risk 2210 AD – Aerial Assault Command Deck has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Zero assertion of notability - seems to be a small, unofficial deck of cards available for sale from a fansite. Passing mention in Risk 2210 A.D. seems sufficient.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 09:48, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
The article Risk 2210 AD - Advanced Tech Command Deck has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Zero assertion of notability - seems to be a small, unofficial deck of cards available for sale from a fansite. Passing mention in Risk 2210 A.D. seems sufficient.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 09:48, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Risk 2210 decks
[edit]Hello. I see you reverted the prods with the explanation that the game has been "accredited on multiple sites", but I don't see any reliable sources listed, just BoardGameGeek and a fan site. Are there any other links that would bring it up to the "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" required by WP:N? Thanks. --McGeddon (talk) 16:27, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- Is Boardgamegeek not considered a reliable independent source that provides significant coverage? Which fan site are you referring to? Is a "fan site" something that is referred to in wiki rules or is it a subjective term? Mentions are also given on www.rateitall.com, www.greatgamesexperiment.com, www.boardgameratings.com, www.nobleknight.com, www.fairplaygames.com, www.boardgameextras.co.uk, www.spiritus-temporis.com, bg.geekdo.com. These are the first handful of sites that came up through a google search. Thanks Meeslow (talk) 08:49, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
- "Risk 2210 AD Fan Club" is a clearly fan site, and WP:RS rules out "self-published media - whether books, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, blogs, personal pages on social networking sites, Internet forum postings, or tweets" as sources, unless the authors are "professionals in the field on which they write".
- WP:N requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" - so far as I can tell, the list of URLs there are just commercial resellers or submit-your-game directory sites, which fail the "sources address the subject directly in detail" of WP:N. Have you had any reviews in mainstream gaming magazines or websites, or won any design awards? --McGeddon (talk) 09:06, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Risk 2210 AD – Aerial Assault Command Deck
[edit]
I have nominated Risk 2210 AD – Aerial Assault Command Deck, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Risk 2210 AD – Aerial Assault Command Deck. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. McGeddon (talk) 09:51, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
File:Risk 2210 AD - Terror Tactics Command Deck.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Risk 2210 AD - Terror Tactics Command Deck.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 23:03, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
File:Terror Tactics Command Deck - Russian Roulette.jpg missing description details
[edit]
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 08:39, 14 April 2013 (UTC)Possibly unfree File:Terror Tactics Command Deck - Russian Roulette.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Terror Tactics Command Deck - Russian Roulette.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:05, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
The file File:Terror Tactics Deck 2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
The file File:Terror Tactics Deck 3.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
The file File:Terror Tactics Deck 1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
