User talk:Medski44/Mitral annular disjunction

peer review

I was assigned to review your article as part of my school elective.

minor suggestions:

-"The cause of MAD is not well understood, and hypotheses of congenital, degenerative, and acquired structural abnormalities exist" consider making two sentences.

-I'm not sure if it would be helpful to add images, as anatomy is difficult to explain/present in a wikipedia article without needing to go into more detail. However, this is something you can consider if you have extra time at the end of the elective!

-History section: You're probably still working on this section, but it might be helpful to add some context or name some specifics (specific pathologists, medical professionals, etc. that first described this condition.

-Diagnosis section: "Autopsy analysis" also seems a little broad, but I understand it's difficult to paraphrase things without plagiarizing. You can consider going into more detail of how this is done.

Everything in the article was relevant and presented in a neutral voice. All of the information was easy to understand and written in simple language. The organization of the article is logical and does not distract from the information within the article. All of the facts are supported by strong evidence and have appropriate citations. The references listed under your article appear to all come from reputable sources and there is a broad range of types of sources. They are also accessible to the public without subscription requirements or pay walls. I do not see any bias in your sources or in your article as a whole. All of the information appears to be the most up to date information on this topic. You did a great job expanding on the existing article! Please take all of my minor suggestions with a grain of salt, as you have obviously done more research on this topic than I have! Faithhsu13 (talk) 16:03, 16 September 2022 (UTC)