User talk:Medboy1

Welcome!

Hello, Medboy1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! The Mark of the Beast (talk) 00:40, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Based on your User page, you appear to have come to Wikipedia with an agenda. Please read WP:NPOV. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 00:40, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain what your relationship is to User:Melissamohammed53? The Mark of the Beast (talk) 01:29, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Medboy1and_User:Melissamohammed53_tag-team_editing. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 01:46, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have no agenda. I know nothing about the articles you are editing. All I see is your proclaimed agenda on your User page and the vandalistic edits you are making. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 01:48, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Live blood analysis. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 01:40, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, regarding this edit summary of yours:

This article is based on a personal opinion,to say "described" is not factual.

The word "described" is not in there to denote personal opinion; rather, it indicates that some but not all experts in the field have come to that conclusion. It suggests to readers that they should draw their own conclusion from all information.

To omit those descriptions would leave the article incomplete. To remove the word fraudulent from certain sentences renders them outright misrepresentative.

If you are really concerned with how subjects are presented in the articles, I suggest you explain your concerns with the sources and presentation in the article at the respective talk pages and wait for consensus to form on whether to remove or alter the text. —C.Fred (talk) 01:48, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts, making personal attacks, and generally abusive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. MastCell ^Talk 04:13, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]