User talk:Meda Keeling

Welcome!

Hi Meda Keeling! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! -- Toddy1 (talk) 19:48, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, thanks for your efforts in anti-vandalism. However, some of your reverts have been problematic. This revert is especially problematic, it undid an IP edit that made the article better. The IP was ordering list entries in the correct order. This revert restored vandalism to the article. Consider this a warning. v/r - Seawolf35 ^T--C 19:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And your use of "only warnings" are wrong. See WP:WARN. v/r - Seawolf35 ^T--C 19:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Im sry 72.24.54.130 (talk) 19:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sry 72.24.54.130 (talk) 19:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:BlueboyLINY, you may be blocked from editing. BlueboyLINY (talk) 19:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User talk:EricKugel has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You issued two warnings to this user for the same single edit to an article, and that editor's edit to that article was correct. Please stop. Schazjmd (talk) 19:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Stop reverting helpful improvements, then posting a final warning on the editor's talk page. _signed,Willondon (talk) 19:45, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Port Elizabeth while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 19:45, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

With articles, we have to use the article name in the lead and the infobox; it is OK to use other name as well as the article name, but we are not allowed to remove the article name. Personally, I think that the article on Port Elizabeth should be called Port Elizabeth and not Gqeberha. If you look at Talk:Gqeberha you will see that there were a series of move discussions, and eventually the woke people amassed enough support to change the article name to Gqeberha. If you want to propose that the article name is changed back to Port Elizabeth, you need to use the process at WP:RSPM.-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:45, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. v/r - Seawolf35 ^T--C 19:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Falsely accusing me for vandalising Wikipedia

You falsely accusing me for vandalising Wikipedia, like the article Ammonium dinitramide. Importing new info and correcting my code errors or others code errors is not vandalism. Last warning! If you accuse me of vandalising Wikipedia again, or even you blocking me from editing Wikipedia, I will take serious measures against you bullying me on Wikipedia! Bernardirfan (talk) 20:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Spicy (talk) 20:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]