User talk:Meanclevelandstreamingmachine

Howdy! :)

December 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Same-sex marriage in California. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Go ahead and blank the warning, it is regarded as proof that you have read it. The warning will still be visible in the history of this page WuhWuzDat 16:48, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Nlu (talk) 16:53, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Marriage. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. WuhWuzDat 16:54, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nlu (talk) 16:57, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Meanclevelandstreamingmachine (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why I am I blocked? I receivd the warning, and stopped. And who is to decide what is vandalism? It doesn't meet the definition at the wikipedia vadalism definition. I thought anyone coud cange these articles.

Decline reason:

Your block reason should be changed to disruptive editing, in fact to "single-purpose disruptive and tendentious account", but you are properly blocked indefinitely. This edit, in which you edited in explicit contradiction to an inline comment, is the very definition of disruption. Yes, anyone can change articles ... as long as they follow policies and guidelines where applicable. You didn't and show no signs of wanting to do so. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:17, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.