User talk:Me lkjhgfdsa

Welcome!

Hello, Me lkjhgfdsa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! The Neokid talk 11:48, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for edit summary

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.

– Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 02:32, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article listed for deletion

Hi Me lkjhgfdsa,

I noticed from the Inclusionist category page that you're an inclusionist, too, so I was wondering if you would be able to do me a huge favor and possibly place a vote here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embarazada. I added a ton to it, citing my sources. If you could, I would be greatly in your debt.

Best wishes,

Primetime 21:52, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, my friend!--Primetime 23:37, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem Me lkjhgfdsa 08:07, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please help - inclusionism is "absurb" now

Sorry to bother you, but as an Inclusionist wikipedia things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion here. Kappa 02:52, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron

Hello, Me lkjhgfdsa. Based on the templates on your talk page, I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia. Note:Keep in mind that Squadron members officially state they are not inclusionists. ~~~~

Hello there

Hello :) VWOzone (Talk) 15:12, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're sitting right next to me you nutter Me lkjhgfdsa (talk) 15:13, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]