User talk:Mdtanveerahmed

{{hangon}} We are just wanting to describe our company as a general reference, not unlike Amazon.com or Starbucks or the like. We have tried to only state facts and not use sales language. Please let us know what statements you would like removed. This was not intended to be an ad, just a statement of facts about this company.

Welcome to Wikipedia. To find out more about how to make useful contributions, take a look at the welcome page. To stay in Wikipedia, an article has to be about something notable, that is, of general interest. See WP:N for an explanation of what that means. Follow the links below to learn more:

To learn more about creating articles, read the introduction, tutorial, and Guide to creating your first article.
Do not write articles about yourself, your company, your band, or your best friend - that's a conflict of interest.
Wikipedia is not a medium for advertising.
For experiments, please use the sandbox. JohnCD 12:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{hangon}} This is not intended to be an ad, just a statement of facts about this company. Please advise as to which lines are offensive and need removal.

CoffeeAM.com

A tag has been placed on CoffeeAM.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD 12:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CoffeeAm.com

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of CoffeeAm.com, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.coffeeam.com/info.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 12:13, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LogoCAC6U5NU.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:LogoCAC6U5NU.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:11, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:LogoCAC6U5NU.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:LogoCAC6U5NU.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:56, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of CoffeeAm.com

A tag has been placed on CoffeeAm.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb 15:46, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of speedy deletion tags

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. --Blanchardb 16:13, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of CoffeeAm.com

A tag has been placed on CoffeeAm.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 16:46, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CoffeeAM.com

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article CoffeeAM.com, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:36, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of CoffeeAM.com

CoffeeAM.com, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that CoffeeAM.com satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CoffeeAM.com and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of CoffeeAM.com during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 18:49, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove the AfD notice again or you WILL be blocked. Removing the notice does not end the discussion — it merely prevents those who might support keeping the article from voting on it. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 18:23, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to CoffeeAM.com, you will be blocked from editing. Removal of Article for Deletion notices is specifically prohibited, and is seen as a bad-faith action on your part. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 18:25, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rainforest-cert.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Rainforest-cert.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. O sama K 10:37, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LogoCAC6U5NU.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:LogoCAC6U5NU.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 10:41, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Birdfriendly-cert.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Birdfriendly-cert.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:10, 4 December 2008 (UTC) --Skier Dude (talk) 08:10, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cjgo 1972 909236.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cjgo 1972 909236.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 10:31, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Usda-cert.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Usda-cert.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:28, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]