User talk:Mdd4696/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Mdd4696. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Welcome

Hello, Mdd4696, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! G Clark 23:40, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Naruto Names Origins and Meanings

Hey André, remember me from NarutoForums? Anyways, I was about to add your Naruto Names: Origins and Meanings page (http://home.wanadoo.nl/debbie.kiki/) to the list of links at the bottom, and then I saw your Wikipedia name on the site. I recognized it because I've seen you edit the Naruto page a few times. I was wondering if there was a reason it wasn't already listed. I think it's a great resource, and although the layout could use some work, I think a lot of other people would agree that it's a good site to list on the Naruto wikipedia page. Let me know what you think on my talk page. --mdd4696 17:09, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

Hi ^^. I would love it if my page was added ^^ I never did it myself, because I believe it would be bad form to do so. However if you think it should be there, by all means, add it ^^--JadziaLover 18:15, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

Rosenrot

Hi Broodwich, I was wondering if you had a source for Rammstein's announcement that Rosenrot will not be released in the U.S.? So far, I have only read that no release dates for the U.S. or Japan have been set. Remember, you're only supposed to add material to Wikipedia that you can cite from an external source. Let me know on my talk page. (Also, I removed the comment at the top of this page about leaving comments not here but on your talk page... this is your talk page!) --mdd4696 00:48, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

This ad is on several sites and there is no announced US release. Broodwich 2:40 AM, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

Well, I don't consider that image to be a reputable source, since it is very easy for anyone to make and there is no author listed. For now, I think we should wait and stick to what we know is fact: There has not been an announced U.S. release date, and the U.S. release has not been officially confirmed or denied. --mdd4696 03:46, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

That's fine with me. I just wanted US fans know that they'd need to import it. I might just put the officially announced release dates up instead and make a note that no US release has been announced yet. Broodwich 5:31 AM, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

Naruto Revert

Hey, just wanted to let you know I reverted your revert on the Naruto page. JadziaLover removed an out-of-place link to an external Naruto image, so I'm not quite sure why you reverted his edit. Let me know if you want to discuss it on my talk page. Thanks! --mdd4696 01:04, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

Probably by mistake; the servers have been acting up all day, and I thought I was the one who deleted that out-of-place link. Weird. Well, anyway, I don't want it there either. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 01:08, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

Happy Diwali

Whitman Middle School

Hey... I was just about to add the exact same comment you left on that anonymous user's page about the Whitman Middle School article for deletion. While I wish someone hadn't beat me to it, it's nice to know there are other people who know how to gently correct new users! --mdd4696 03:10, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your encouragement for my doing the right thing before! =) Btw, I have built a script to speed up voting on AFDs and am looking for feedback. Please have a go! jnothman ^talk 03:25, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

afd helper

This makes voting much faster. The only thing I don't like is that sometimes the AFD page hangs as the Vote links are inserted. Also, it can be touchy if you click in one of the textboxes before it saves the page. I will probably make a copy of it to tweak for myself, but it's a good starting point. Thanks! --mdd4696 21:29, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

These are probably both very browser dependent things. Opera doesn't hang and seems to perform the vote-link-adding operation pretty quickly, but I would like it if there were a faster way to do it. I've also been doing a lot of tweaking and adding of features myself, so if you want to try patch some bugs, go ahead, but I'd rather if you did tweaking & patching in public. jnothman ^talk 02:25, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

Chore Boy

Hello, I noticed that you created the Chore Boy page on May 14, 2005. I was curious if that brand is notable above other brands for any particular reason. Please let me know on my talk page; I feel that the article is a good candidate for deletion. Thanks! --mdd4696 00:27, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Hello Mdd4696, I didn't create the Chore Boy article. I just asked a question on the talk page (which hasn't been answered). I would prefer to have the article expanded rather than deleted. Thanks, Arcturus 08:40, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

A phrase's Google hit count is not criteria for notability alone. If you look at the results, most of them are links to stores that sell the product, or are entirely unrelated. This product was not the first of its kind, and I don't think there is anything special about it compared to other brands. In my opinion, this makes it unfit for a stub, much less an article. Unless someone can provide us with some sort of information that goes beyond a description of the item, like cultural significance or historical perspective, this article is useless; and I don't believe anyone can do that. Let me know what you think on my talk page. --mdd4696 16:33, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

The google hits are enough to show that a lot of people know what they are and talk about them, which means that they are something people would hope to be able to find in wikipedia. Kappa 00:28, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

Chore Boy article aside, I am getting the impression that you think using the number of Google hits alone is a valid way to justify an article's notability. It is not, and I hope that I am just mistaken. What I was saying was that just because a phrase turns up a certain number of hits on Google, it doesn't mean that all of those hits are relevant to your search. I looked through the Google results for "chore boy" and I did not see any pages other than those selling the item and pages that used the words "chore boy" in a context unrelated to the product mentioned in the article on Wikipedia. Therefore, the number of Google hits does not support your claim that it shows enough people know about the product to expect it on Wikipedia. --mdd4696 02:09, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

Try this google search: "chore boy" cocaine Kappa 02:12, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

Now those are some valid Google hits... Thanks for pointing that out for me, I had no idea something like that was out there. --mdd4696 02:17, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

Sari photo

Unfortunately, I did not ask for the authorization of these two women to take their photograph. For legal reasons, it may not be possible to show it on Wikipedia without blurring them to make them not recognizable. David.Monniaux 16:20, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Admin nomination

Hi James, I just voted on your nomination. Please fix your responses to the "questions for candidate". Keep up your good work and good luck on your college applications! --mdd4696 02:01, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

Yowza! Sorry about that, fixed my answers, it WAS just a copy/paste error. Please go back and look 'em over while you have a chance! Staxringold 03:21, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

No problem, I won't hold it against you :). --mdd4696 03:26, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

Featured article for December 25th

I noticed you have listed yourself in Category:Atheist Wikipedians. That said, you will probably be interested in my suggested featured article for December 25th: Omnipotence paradox. The other suggestion being supported by others for that date is Christmas, although Raul654 has historically been against featuring articles on the same day as their anniversary/holiday. — BRIAN0918 • 2005-11-28 08:26

Skrewdriver

Please follow the instructions on the copyright violation notice and put your rewrite on a Temp page, so that the copyvio can be deleted from the article's history. User:Zoe|^(talk) 03:31, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know about the copyvio procedure... I've put up the "new" version on the subpage. I wasn't really sure what happened to articles after the copyright notice was posted on them (WP:CP doesn't really make it clear), so I guessed. In any case, now I know. Thanks! --mdd4696 03:49, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. At the end of the discussion period on the Copyright problems page, the original page is deleted and the Temp page moved over. User:Zoe|^(talk) 03:53, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

American Measurements

Hi R'son-W, if you'd like to read more on how templates work, you can look at Wikipedia:Template_namespace. Also, I noticed that you reverted the size of the "lb.ft." text back to size 14pt. I had changed it to 10pt because at 14pt, it stretches it's containing div. A number of other templates use a 10pt font to prevent this, such as Template:User_java. I would like to change your template to be consistent with the other ones, what do you think? --mdd4696 00:09, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for helping fix my template, I was trying to figure out how to do that. R'son-W 22:32, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

I hadn't noticed any stretching, and it looked consistent with the other templates on my user page, and the user pages of others, so I brought it back to 14 pt. But if the "lb.ft." stretches out its div when you see it, you should definitely resize the font. Another solution would be to choose something other than "lb.ft." to represent american measurements, like "mile" or something. R'son-W 01:25, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

I changed it to ft-lb because that is the abbreviation for foot-pound, an obscure but entirely valid unit, and that makes it just small enough to stay at 14pt without stretching the div. I wanted to keep lb in there somehow, since it is such a weird abbreviation. (And about the way it looks on my screen: sometimes I have to remind myself that my screen doesn't always look like other's, because I have mine set at 125dpi instead of the normal 96dpi, which can sometimes do really screwy things!) Anyways, I think the current revision is a good compromise. --mdd4696 01:34, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

Works for me. Foot-pound isn't that obscure (although it lacks a page... Hm...). It's the measurement of torque, if I remember correctly. R'son-W 01:37, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

I mistyped the link, it's foot-pound. --mdd4696 01:42, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

Early voting

Hello, I notice that you recently voted on a few featured picture candidates. Please read the top of the featured pictures page; the process has recently changed. Now there is a 2 day commenting period before voting starts, so that there can be feedback on the image and it can be cleaned up if necessary. ••MDD4696 ( talk - contribs ) 16:04, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

My mistake in voting too early. Apologies - Adrian Pingstone 17:56, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

Featured Picture process

Hello, I notice that you recently voted on a few featured picture candidates. Please read the top of the featured pictures page; the process has recently changed. Now there is a 2 day commenting period before voting starts, so that there can be feedback on the image and it can be cleaned up if necessary.

Also, please do not remove the comments people leave on your discussion page. See Wikipedia:Talk_page#Etiquette and Wikipedia:Refactoring_talk_pages. ••MDD4696 ( talk - contribs ) 16:03, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice. I'll keep my talk page as is from now on. sikander 05:36, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Tram image

Hi KF, I couldn't tell if you were a little bit offended by my criticisms of the image; I just wanted to let you know that I really do like the picture quite a bit and that those issues (cropping, centering) were rather minor. Anyways, if you get a chance at some point, I think a lot of people would appreciate a higher resolution version, even if it doesn't become a Featured Picture. I know I would! ••MDD4696 ( talk - contribs ) 16:35, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Hi, and thanks for your message. Of course I'm not offended. (It would take a lot more than that.) All I was trying to say is that, generally speaking, it seems a bit unfair to apply "featured image" criteria to pictures which were never intended to be more than ordinary (though of acceptable quality) illustrations of an article. I could imagine others who, in the past, did not self-nominate their images having similar feelings about that kind of procedure. All the best, <K F> 18:04, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Can I say that while it is perfectly understandable for you to feel a bit defensive towards the comments on the featured picture page, I feel like they were criticisms of its suitability for being featured more than a criticism of the photo itself, and I don't think you need ask for everyone to stop commenting because you didn't submit it for that purpose. Of course, thats your choice, but we'd appreciate constructive efforts on your part as I think the majority of us feel the photo has plenty of potential. Diliff 01:25, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Oops, wrong talk page. :) Diliff 01:40, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Hello

Hello Cele4, and welcome to Wikipedia; the two images you have uploaded are fantastic! I was looking at the source website, however, I can't read German! I was wondering if you could point me to the page that describes the images' license information? Leave a message on my talk page if you could, thanks! ••MDD4696 ( talk - contribs ) 23:32, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Hi, sorry, i can not english. I stand your message not. Is the License by stirnlappenbasilisk not ready? I have more Picture with the license cc-by-sa-2.0-de. The License for the english Wikipedia is GFDL? cele4 06:47, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

Hello again. I want to know what the licenses of your pictures are. Are the pictures copyrighted? On [1] it says "Bilder dürfen nicht kopiert werden. © beim jeweiligen Fotografen." Which website gives permission to use the pictures on Wikipedia? ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 23:27, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

Babelfish Translation: Hallo wieder. Ich möchte wissen, was die Lizenzen Ihrer Fotographien sind. Werden die Fotographien Urheberrecht gesichert? Auf [2] ihm sagt, daß "Bilder dürfen nicht kopiert werden. © beim jeweiligen Fotografen" Welche Web site gibt Erlaubnis, die Abbildungen auf Wikipedia zu benutzen? ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 23:27, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

nochmals ich

Ich schreibe auf deutsch. Die Bilder habe ich gemacht. Daher ist es mein copyright und ich kann die zu verfügung stellen. Also kein problem. Lizenz = GFDL Alle Bilder die ich hier hochlade sind meine eigenen Bilder und daher copyright free This is all my picture. the website www.tierlexikon.ch is my site. cele4 08:07, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Danke! ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 23:26, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Image Placement

Hi Fir, let me be the first to make a complaint about your exceedingly awesome contributions (you make me want to become a photographer). I do not like the way you format the photos you add to articles. Having all of them stacked in a column is not appropriate on Wikipedia for two reasons: they are hard to connect with sections of the article, and they are distracting. Per WP:Images,

"Articles that use more than one image should present a variety of material near relevant text. Three uniformed portraits would be redundant for a biography of a famous general. A map of a battle and an picture of its aftermath would provide more information to readers. Images should be large enough to reveal relevant detail without overwhelming the surrounding article text."

Of course, this is only a guideline, but please take it into account when you add images to a page. For example, I just reorganized Gamelan. I feel that the new format better represents the community's preference. What do you think? ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 02:11, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Ooops, didn't read your discussion page closely enough. ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 02:17, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Hi MDD4696, Thanks for your compliments, and I'll taken on board the suggestions you tempered them with. I just find it hard to read the disjointed text when the pictures are left and right. Anyway I'll scrap my pet "{|align=right" format. I think the Gamelan article is better, but maybe you know how to better word the captions? I just took the snaps at the Indonesian Embassy. On an unrelated note, I see you seem to have been influenced by the Myth Busters "Death Ray" experiemtn! ;-) --Fir0002 04:35, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

I completely understand what you mean by "disjointed text." In some instances, having the images alternate right and left definately looks crummy... image placement can be a delicate process. I will also try to think of some good captions for those pictures. And about the solar array, I actually got the idea from a science hobbyist website, and only after I did some more research did I find out about the MythBusters episode. In any case, it's just about done... it just needs to be programmed, but considering that it's winter in North America, it might be a while before it's completed. ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 21:47, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Nominate

Hello. I will the Pulmed Basilisk nominate. I cant not. why?

User talk:Nymph

[Message to <K F>] I have asked that user to remove the gallery. However, as this user is editing only sporadically, I'm less than confident that he or she will comply with my request. I'll keep an eye on it. (BTW, in reference to the "Recht am eigenen Bild": I wasn't trying to be a legalistic nitpicker, and I certainly didn't want to offend you. But it's precisely this kind of (ab-)uses that made me raise the point.) Lupo 13:09, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Could you please remove the image gallery at User:Nymph/girls? In combination with your user name (think nymphet) it is most unfortunate. Lupo 13:02, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

I support this request. <K F> 14:57, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Considering that it is his user page, I don't think he has any obligation to remove the gallery, no matter who disapproves. ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 22:40, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Perhaps I should rephrase my comment -- although some users may disapprove of a gallery of young girls by a user with the name "Nymph", he is not insinuating or endorsing illegal activity. As such, I feel that he is within his own right to maintain or remove the gallery at his own will. ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 05:49, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

I'm afraid I don't get you, mate. I just made the gallery because I was bored. If fringe sexual orientations disturb you, that is your own problem, not mine. Sorry I can't be of more help. :( Good luck with life. --Nymph 02:33, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

I'd like to add, if there's any specific picture you've uploaded which you don't want there, or any picture at all really, you can delete it. I don't really care. But I'd rather if you just.. you know, not look at it. That's what I usually do when something offends me.. --Nymph 02:35, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Hi, was it really necessary to add your comment to a request made by two people? Is there any particular reason you are interfering there, addressing someone on their user page in the third person? Could it be that you'd see things in a different light if you found a picture of your little daughter under the heading "Nymph"? <K F> 22:21, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

No need for personal attacks; I didn't think I'd be seen as butting in. I only meant to point out that an image gallery of girls is not in-and-of-itself distasteful. ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 05:42, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

I've rephrased my comment on User talk:Nymph. Also, I'm not sure if you were offended at my leaving a comment on the user page, or at the substance of my comment. I saw my comment as being a response to a discussion, much like what you left in response to Lupo's comment. ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 05:53, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Hi KF. Sorry to leave multiple comments, but your note on my talk page just really bothers me. I don't want to be viewed as a pedophile, and I don't want you or anyone else thinking I'm a sicko. I knew that I was stepping into delicate territory when I left that comment on Nymph's talk page, but I stand by my claim that he has the right to display that gallery. I was not using his talk page to communicate strictly with him, but to present my viewpoint in contrast to yours and Lupo's. Perhaps that is a misuse of his discussion page, and if it is, I apologize (although I don't believe it was, I will research it furthur to be sure). Perhaps there is a better spot to discuss the content of his user page? In any case, please respond and let me know what you think. Hopefully what I've just written clears things up, but if it doesn't, I want to make sure that I've been able to explain myself. ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 06:37, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Hi again, and thanks for your three messages. It seems to me that you see this matter far too legistically, and that alone is what made me slightly mad. To continue viewing things from that angle, everyone in their right mind will agree that you, just as any other contributor, have all the right in the world to add what you added to someone's talk page. Of course there is no "misuse" whatsoever. Similarly, everyone will agree that a collection of harmless images does not violate any laws, rules, regulations or whatever.

This is exactly what requests are all about: You ask someone to do something for you, while at the same time you know you are not entitled to that help or service. Just as on a crowded train: You ask someone to give up their seat for you. If they refuse, there is nothing you can do about it, whether their refusal seems justified or not. Or imagine a phone-in radio show: You call the station and request a particular song to be played, but if they choose not to there is no way you could sue them. IANAL, but it seems obvious that a request is not a contract where two parties agree to do something for their mutual benefit.

This is where you as the third party come in. Imagine yourself as another person on that crowded train standing next to the one asking someone if they may sit down. Before either can react, you tell them that the one who is sitting has no legal obligation to give up their seat and, by doing so, encourage them to remain seated. I don't imagine you do that sort of thing when you are using public means of transport.

Again, this is not a question of having a right; it's a question of exercising it or deliberately refraining from doing so. It is a moral rather than a legal question. It is to do with conventions in our society, not laws.

And by the way, I have yet to come across any paedophiles here at Wikipedia.

Have a nice Sunday, and all the best, <K F> 12:17, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

I see what you mean, and I apologize. I think now that I was out of place. ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 18:52, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Majesty (band)/Temp

Hi Enochlau. You recently deleted a page I created, Majesty_(band)/Temp. It was created as part of the copyvio process (see Majesty_(band)). Was your deletion a mistake or was there a reason it was deleted? As I understand it, the temporary page for a copyvio is supposed to remain in place so that people can construct a new article... I made a (very) brief stub. Could you fill me in? ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 05:34, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

It was tagged as "incorrect hdg format" by User:Light current. I jumped to the conclusion that it was just another Temp page that had been finished with and unneeded. Obviously, that is not the case, and I've undeleted it. Enochlau 05:38, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Incorrect tag

Hi Light Current, I just wanted to leave a quick note -- you incorrectly tagged an article of mine (Majesty (band)/Temp) with a speedy delete, reason: "incorrect hdg format." The page I created was for the copyvio process -- see Majesty (band). I noticed you did this on a couple of other articles, so I just wanted to make sure that if it wasn't just an error that you realized some pages are actually supposed to be titled like that. ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 05:46, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

I did not realise this and I apologise. So if they have /Temp they should be left is that right?--Light current 05:50, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

When there's a copyvio, /Temp is used to build up a new version without the copyvio. However, once the new page has been written and the content moved from /Temp to the main article, /Temp should be then be deleted. Enochlau 06:06, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

I see now. Thanks--Light current 06:08, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Band stub

Hi! Thanks for contacting me. The reason the article was deleted was because of its length, namely a single sentence stating something that a user might already know if they were researching the subject. That's a speedy delete for lack of content. A good stub should have a minimum of three informative sentences. Please feel free to recreate the article, but add a bit more information to it when you do. Best, Lucky 6.9 18:46, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Geisha

Thanks very much for your support. I appreciate you taking the time. ToddLara 23:53, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Regarding Image:1985track.jpg

I believe that the image you uploaded is public domain, as you claimed, but I could not find any original sources which describe its license. However, I did find the NOAA National Hurricane Center's data on Hurricane Gloria, which had a Hurricane Tracking map. Since we can verify that the image I just found is definately public domain, and it is higher resolution (albeit it is not a complete image like you had) I was wondering what you thought of replacing the current image with the one I found. Let me know on my talk page, thanks! ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 02:27, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

The image which I uploaded says that it's by the US Department of Commerce, which would make it public domain. But since you say the image you uploaded is *definitely* public domain I have no problem using tht one instead. That image seems to have better detail anyway. anthony 12:26, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

User:Gojistomp

I have requested an administrator's attention on the noticeboard. Leave a comment if you'd like. ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 18:44, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. I've added a comment. He created about 20 pages last week which I went through one by one to check they really were all copyvios (and pretty unencyclopedic too) and flagged them for speedy deletion, which took ages. I got him blocked briefly, but between asking and it happening he had time to create plenty :-( --Whouk (talk) 21:06, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Re:Superb Fairy-wren

... you eat fairy-wrens? ;) ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 01:36, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Look at that bird. if you couldn't, wouldn't you eat it? =P ZeWrestler ^Talk 05:37, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

It's about 5cm, you not going to get much eating out of it. --liquidGhoul 12:34, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Re Mdd4696: I do have an uncropped version of it. I will download it to commons when I have the time. Thanks for the compliment and vote of support. --liquidGhoul 12:34, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Hello Mdd4696

I have nominate a portrait of the plumed basilisk. i can this not. sorry!!! can you help me? cele4 19:03, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Hello Cele! Your image looks like it was nominated properly. I will make sure everything is OK. By the way, I use Babelfish to translate my comments into German. You can use it to translate your comments into English, if you like. ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 19:42, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Babelfish translation: Hallo Cele! Ihre Bildaussehen wie es wurden richtig ernannt. Ich stelle sicher, daß alles OK ist. Übrigens verwende ich Babelfish, um meine Anmerkungen in Deutschen zu übersetzen. Sie können es verwenden, um Ihre Anmerkungen ins Englische zu übersetzen, wenn Sie mögen.

Hello Mdd4696 RE

can you say to me, where my picture is in nomination? The Portrait is not anywhere more http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Stirnlappenbasiliskportrait.jpg cele4 21:23, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Fixed nomination I'm sorry--I made a mistake before. Your photo has been nominated correctly now. Also, do the Babelfish translations help when I leave comments on your page? Babelfish translation: Ich bin traurig -- ich machte einen Fehler vorher. Ihr Foto ist richtig jetzt ernannt worden. Auch helfen die Babelfish Übersetzungen, wenn ich Anmerkungen auf Ihrer Seite lasse? ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 09:21, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

I translate now also with babel fish. go thank well in such a way cele4 16:25, 27 December 2005 (UTC)