User talk:Mdcdnaeifkd
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Nic.cg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Getting Started
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Hyacinth (talk) 09:38, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
March 2024
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Drmies (talk) 01:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)- @Drmies I just deleted my own comments on the talk page of the Forte number article. Banning me is not justified. Mdcdnaeifkd (talk) 02:38, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- You are WP:BLOCKed. Not WP:BANned -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:03, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Mdcdnaeifkd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I just deleted my own comments on the talk page of the Forte number article. Banning me is not justified.
Decline reason:
Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- @Drmies This is unjustified. Mdcdnaeifkd (talk) 02:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Mdcdnaeifkd (talk) 02:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Making nonsense edits and then deleting them is disruptive. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:00, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Deepfriedokra I meant no harm, it was just the talk page and it was not that nonsensical. Mdcdnaeifkd (talk) 14:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Deepfriedokra I care about this page and would like to eventually provide a citation for the section on bracelets. Mdcdnaeifkd (talk) 14:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Deepfriedokra How can this be disruptive if it leaves no change? Mdcdnaeifkd (talk) 15:07, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not a toy for your amusement. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:30, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- And let me be cleaerer. The nonsense edits were disruptive, even if you reverted them -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:31, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Deepfriedokra Nonsense? FUCK YOU. They weren't nonsense. YOU are nonsense. Deepfriedokra makes sense? FUCK YOU. Does that make sense to you? Mdcdnaeifkd (talk) 15:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- I was talking about using necklaces to count scales in 2008. I rediscovered Forte numbers independently. Forte never mentioned bracelets and necklaces as far as I know. This is new. Mdcdnaeifkd (talk) 15:43, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not a toy for your amusement. -- Deepfriedokra
- What makes you think I see wikipedia as a "toy for my amusement"?
- Am I a toy for your amusement? It certainly feels like I am.
- Do you enjoy amusing yourself with my account?
- Do you do that to other people? Kinds of people who like toys? Deepfriedokra? Mdcdnaeifkd (talk) 15:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- And let me be cleaerer. The nonsense edits were disruptive, even if you reverted them -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:31, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not a toy for your amusement. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:30, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Deepfriedokra I meant no harm, it was just the talk page and it was not that nonsensical. Mdcdnaeifkd (talk) 14:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)