User talk:Md Abu Sayeed BD

Move

New User

Hello, I'm EngrShakamal. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Atiya Anisha did not appear constructive. Do you know what unsourced content is called? If you don't know, find out first and then edit it nicely. You are repeatedly removing article information. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. I request you not to do this again. Thanks.EngrShakamal (talk) 08:45, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop uploading copyright images. Take yourself or upload a picture that is not uploaded anywhere. Md Abu Sayeed BD (talk) 08:49, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know it's a copyrighted image? Check out wikimedia commons and then comment on this.EngrShakamal (talk) 09:05, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Your recent editing history at Atiya Anisha shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – bradv 16:43, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Daily Rudrabangla has been accepted

The Daily Rudrabangla, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 07:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Daily Rudrabangla The article has been removed as a banned or blocked user for violating restrictions. But there is no match with the banned user. I don't want the article to stay because I think the user @MdsShakil has a personal grudge with the banned user. @MdsShakil thinks page is coming under banned username but not coming. Seven pages of the article match the name of the owner of this newspaper. The article was also made in Bengali where he was making the same comment and deleted it. Please help wikipedia should not be shut down for any reason. Md Abu Sayeed BD (talk) 13:42, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MdsShakil Md Abu Sayeed BD (talk) 13:43, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Md Sunnat Ali Mollik per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Md Sunnat Ali Mollik. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

– bradv 19:31, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Md Abu Sayeed BD (talk) 02:42, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bradv why would the mentioned block user suspect me to be blocked. Iam a new to wikipedia and the registered person I created has the same name but a completely different person. It can be said that the block user with @MdsShakil has a relationship with the user otherwise he blocks in Bangla Wikipedia check here every now and then. which user will be blioked if he creates a page with name? Md Abu Sayeed BD (talk) 03:01, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are blocked because you used multiple accounts to deceive other editors. That is against policy. – bradv 03:16, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bradv Here's how I'm using multiple accounts to trick new editors. I have been blocked by suspecting a blocked user. Md Abu Sayeed BD (talk) 03:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get what you are trying to say by pinging me. We already have enough evidence to determine who you are. —MdsShakil (talk) 08:19, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MdsShakil What evidence is there? Md Abu Sayeed BD (talk) 08:40, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]