User talk:Md. Sirajuddaula

Welcome

Hi Md. Sirajuddaula! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ShaanSengupta^Talk 18:07, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello @Md. Sirajuddaula, you might have noticed that I have reverted your format of infobox at pages of state legislative assemblies. You might be wondering what went wrong. I am here to explain you. Although I have done it in the summary. Whenever we want to change a format which has been there since long (like in this case, that format is there in all pages for years), we need to discuss it with other editors. Your format is not ok for all the pages because generally party colours are enough and there are many cases where alliances have no color, there are parties that support the Government but are not an alliance partner. Or for opposition there are multiple parties which are not allied but sit in opposition. Indian politics is not bipolar but multipolar so this format won't be ok with every page. Rest before making further change, I would request you to discuss here. If you want to discuss this with a larger audience then you may take this to WikiProject Indian politics since it is related to it. ShaanSengupta^Talk 18:21, 5 November 2023 (UTC)nd[reply]

I liked that format because that format had been used in many foreign countries' national and regional legislatures. Yeah, pleases provide the link to discusses as I'm new here. Md. Sirajuddaula (talk) 05:56, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Md. Sirajuddaula Just because you/me/we or anyone likes something, it can't be added. Its true that that format is used in foreign legislatures, but as I told you Indian Politics is multipolar and many Alliances don't have a colour or a formal name, so changes are very less that it can be used in all pages of Indian legislature. But since upon want to discuss it you can do it on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Indian politics. There the people will put forward their view and please put the link of this discussion too over there. ShaanSengupta^Talk 11:01, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But NDA, INDIA, LDF, UDF, MVA, MGB etc has colors as used in Wikipedia. Md. Sirajuddaula (talk) 12:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Md. Sirajuddaula I asked you to discuss but you don't seem interested in discussing and gaining consensus as per Wikipedia rules. You continue to add it despite asking not to. This is a collaborative project and not someone's property. You need to gain consensus from every other person interested. Now coming to your point that the said alliances have colour. True. But there is a BRS + AIMIM alliance in Telangana which has no colour. There is a BSP + SAD + GGP + INLD alliances which has no colour. There is a TDP + Janasena alliance that has no colour. How will you make it uniformed in every infobox. There are oarties which are not allied with anyone. That's why I said Indian politics is multipolar and this is the problem with this format. We need uniformity which if possible can be achieved only through discussion. Please don't make new changes without engaging in one. ShaanSengupta^Talk 12:08, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indian National Congress

Hello @Md. Sirajuddaula, Thank you for your valuable contributions to Wikipedia. I hope you are having a great time editing. Please be advised that before making any changes to an article, you need to reach a consensus. For example, regarding the Political position of INC, you can find the consensus here. As of now, your edits have been reverted. Kindly refrain from making any changes to the political position section before discussing it on the article's talk page. Good luck! 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ^🍁 08:35, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits at Next Indian general election in Maharashtra appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ShaanSengupta^Talk 10:51, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

INC has higher vote share than NCP and MIM has more seats than Congress. So, both must be added. Sharad Pawer is NCP president. Md. Sirajuddaula (talk) 11:21, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moreover, you've arranged them wrongly. Md. Sirajuddaula (talk) 11:22, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion polls predict Congress may win 16 seats MIM 1 to 2 seats Md. Sirajuddaula (talk) 11:23, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am reverting status-quo. Means the last version before the dispute arose. Wait until we finish this. Now I shall explain you point-wise.

Party president's are used when leader is not present. Here in case of NCP Supriya Sule is the leader of NCP in Lok Sabha. So she will be added and not Sharad Pawar. Also she is the current working President too.
AIMIM don't even have 1% vote share in last election and won just 1 out of 48. Not being considered a major player in opinion polls by reliable sources, hardly gets 1 seat in them. Hence it cant be added.
For Shiv Sena, whenever there is a debate in Lok Sabha on some bill, party leader gets to speak for max time. And Shrikant Shinde and Rahul Shewale get to speak for maximum time. So either of them are leader.
Please show me one opinion poll by a reliable source which says Congress may win 16 seats in Maharashtra as you have claimed.
As you said MIM has more seats than Congress so it should be added, Both had 1 seat, Congress MP died and by-election is due. So invalid.
You said INC has greater vote share than NCP it doesn't matter. Reliable sources predict NCP as major compare to INC.

Please explain all this before re-reverting the status quo. If you do so again, I shall report to admins to handle this. Also why are you changing Nitin Gadkari image. The image added by you is old, and the one added by me is new and of better resolution. ShaanSengupta^Talk 12:57, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But I think for now all parties which were added in Next Maharashtra Legislative Assembly election must be added. INC is the main opposition party in Maharashtra is missing from infobox. Md. Sirajuddaula (talk) 07:01, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weather we add MIM or not we must add INC and NCP lead by Ajit Pawar Md. Sirajuddaula (talk) 07:05, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

INC won 1 seat but he died. It's not INC's fault Md. Sirajuddaula (talk) 07:12, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Legislative and Parliamentary elections are different. But I am still adding other parties because of the complexity of Maharashtra politics with factions. But for Leader, only Lok Sabha leader is added, not party leader. Donot replace that. ShaanSengupta^Talk 07:26, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Marxist Economist per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marxist Economist. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 19:16, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Md. Sirajuddaula (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What is the proof that I'm a sockpuppet of another account. Please consider and Why it says I'm blocked. Md. Sirajuddaula (talk) 12:55, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Aside from the private technical evidence(which even I cannot see), the evidence is described at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marxist Economist. 331dot (talk) 13:52, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.