Jump to content

User talk:Mcooperwhite

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mcooperwhite, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Mcooperwhite! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Soni (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Mcooperwhite, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please complete the student training, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:39, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Naïve realism (psychology), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://web.mit.edu/curhan/www/docs/Articles/15341_Readings/Negotiation_and_Conflict_Management/Ross_Ward_Naive_Realism.pdf, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Naïve realism (psychology) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Graham Beards (talk) 23:27, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your question

[edit]

Replied at Talk:Naïve_realism_(psychology)#Copyright_issue. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:52, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Me too. Graham Beards (talk) 22:34, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Naïve realism (psychology)

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Naïve realism (psychology) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Delldot -- Delldot (talk) 22:41, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! Any interest in working on this any time this week? Or would it be better for me to turn this down for now and possibly review it later if you have enough time to come back and work on it? delldot ∇. 06:52, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Naïve realism (psychology)

[edit]

The article Naïve realism (psychology) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Naïve realism (psychology) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Delldot -- Delldot (talk) 04:01, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]