User talk:Mcnordine

Welcome!

Hello, Mcnordine, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited appears to be an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. Your user page, however, is a great place to write about yourself, making sure to stay within user page guidelines. Just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit it normally.

The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page. If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to it, please propose the changes on its talk page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! CNMall41 (talk) 06:06, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monik Constance Nordine (December 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are also issues with the layout of the draft - the table at the start is not the usual way to present information in a biography. Read some other biographies to notice how they are laid out.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Monik Constance Nordine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Monik Constance Nordine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 11:22, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mcnordine! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MurielMary (talk) 11:22, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Monik Constance Nordine concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Monik Constance Nordine, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Monik Constance Nordine

Hello, Mcnordine. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Monik Constance Nordine".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:53, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello. Your recent edit to List of Romani people appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) 06:46, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, wrong template. Please stop adding names whose articles do not clearly support inclusion in the list. Picasso, for example, doesnt mention Romani at all. EvergreenFir (talk) 06:48, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Romani people. EvergreenFir (talk) 06:56, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Evergreen Fir I am sure you mean well but you may not be knowledgeable with regards to Roma culture and Roma history. There are many difficulties citing information with regards to Roma people, the main one being that it is an aural culture still today and therefore citations are difficult and sometimes impossible to find. The level of institutional racism that this culture has undergone surpasses anything I have come across so far - and I have studied and followed issues with regards to Black Americans. Having a comprehensive list of notable Romani people is helpful and excluding known Romas on the basis of references seems mean. Picasso was Roma and so was Charlie Chaplin. Mcnordine (talk) 09:56, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]