User talk:Mcgarryarsenic

January 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at McGarry, Ontario‎. No, creating a new account does not allow you to restore the same unsourced material again. Meters (talk) 17:41, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Meters. Thank you. I have to go back and find all my misinformation. 4 tildes. Mcgarryarsenic (talk) 17:50, 25 January 2023 (UTC) 🧚[reply]

And recognize when I acted petty in my edits. Mcgarryarsenic (talk) 17:51, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As I asked on Talk:McGarry, Ontario: "Yes" or "No"? Are you the same user who is currently blocked as user:MsMisinformation and user:Knowledge1253? Meters (talk) 17:55, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above warning applies either way, as you are clearly the same user as the IPs. Meters (talk) 17:56, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am terrified that I unknowingly did something wrong. Yes. I am a not very good editor and get my submissios deleted for a myriad of reasons. NBut I still like wikipedianing and adding knowledge, to the best of my ability. Mcgarryarsenic (talk) 04:00, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again, as I have already asked you: "Yes" or "No"? Are you the same user who is currently blocked as user:MsMisinformation and user:Knowledge1253? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meters (talk • contribs) 05:13, January 26, 2023 (UTC)

Yes. And now you will block me again. Mcgarryarsenic (talk) 11:56, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested a block. You have been told more than once that you are not allowed to edit using any IP or named account while you are blocked. You may request an unblock at User talk:Knowledge1253; however, given your continuous socking and your continued problems with sourcing, WP:OR, and WP:SYNTH I would argue against an unblock. Meters (talk) 23:25, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct in stance,meters. But I do like the people I meet here, even you, whom I am always arguing with. Mcgarryarsenic (talk) 20:24, 27 January 2023 (UTC)🧚[reply]

your stance on my disastrous editing Mcgarryarsenic (talk) 20:25, 27 January 2023 (UTC)🧚[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Knowledge1253 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Knowledge1253. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 09:15, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to contribute, you must make an unblock request from your original account—not create a new account and say sorry. See the guide to appealing sockpuppetry blocks. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 09:17, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. That is my plan. I am so grateful the editors let me stay despite my incompetent edits. Looking forward to mentor under CT5555. Not doing anything for a while till I figure out what a sock puppet is, and compose my list of transgressions and ask forgiveness. Mcgarryarsenic (talk) 20:21, 27 January 2023 (UTC)🧚[reply]