User talk:Mcfuggins
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Mcfuggins! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Cavalryman (talk) 09:34, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you! I'm hoping to continue my contributions to canid topics, and would like to also lend my help in the Dogs WikiProject where possible.Mcfuggins (talk) 02:55, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Mcfuggins, I don't doubt that he said it, but not everything that a person says about this or that bit of news need be in the article, especially not if it's a GA. User:Walter Görlitz was quite correct in pointing to WP:NOTNEWS. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 15:21, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- Considering that he was asked a direct, pointed question regarding the specifics of a notable work he worked on, and gave direct answers, I feel comfortable saying I disagree 100% that this is not notable, but I’m not going to fight this battle if the edit is just going to be continually reverted. Mcfuggins (talk) 16:07, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- We can see you disagree 110 percent, which is why you're edit warring to keep this in the article. It's NOTNEWS. Not everything a notable band does or members is encyclopedic.
- In particular with this upcoming release, we would want to report on what reliable reviewers say about the style of album, not what their publicist is telling them to say to try to hype the work. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:12, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- I am not engaging in edit warring. I stated my interpretation of its notability, others disagreed and it was removed. I have not attempted to revert it a second time, as I stated before. We clearly interpret the NOTNEWS guidelines differently. I’m in the minority on this topic and that’s fine, which is why I’m disengaging from this content being added to the article. Mcfuggins (talk) 18:37, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Alaskan husky has a new comment
[edit]
- I've responded on the comment section - Please see my response, and review the Sled Dog Talk page to see that the issue of the AFD was discussed extensively there, with the consensus to re-construct the Alaskan Husky page with a new draft. Mcfuggins (talk) 15:30, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Dog
[edit]Please take things up at the talk page rather than edit war. LittleJerry (talk) 18:44, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)