User talk:Mcepeci

I am asking to please be unblocked. I would like contribute honestly and objectively.-- Thanks.

Can I please be unblocked? I want to write and contribute honestly to wikipedia. Thanks.

{{unblock|With all respect, I did make this other account but I never used it. I never edited anything. I guess I meant to say that I never made a socket to go and add stuff to wikipedia. I could of used his name and edit stuff but I did NOT. I want to add stuff legitimately and honestly.}

Mcepeci (talk) 04:24, 14 July 2016 (UTC) Please unblock me. I have important information to contribute to wikipedia. You can carefully observe my writing. I will be careful and respectful. I think Bbb23 has blocked me because of Sockpuppet. However, I don't have any socks. Thanks.[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mcepeci (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me. I have important information to contribute to wikipedia. You can carefully observe my writing. I will be careful and respectful. I think Bbb23 has blocked me because of Sockpuppet. However, I don't have any socks. Thanks. Mcepeci (talk) 00:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You want to be unblockd, and claim to have no socks, but you just created a new account, Moshano (talk · contribs). Request declined. —DoRD (talk) 01:48, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Welcome!

Hello, Mcepeci, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

January 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 00:34, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock--why am I being blocked? The last time I logged in I tried to discuss about using murder vs. killed regarding the Itamar attack.

Did you read the notice right above your post? It says you are blocked for Sock Puppetry. In other words you are accused of using more than one account in a way that violates Wikipedia policy. -- GB fan 03:03, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear BB3 -- I would like to not be blocked. I was not the person that did the other changes. Also Vquar has violated the 3 revert rule and has never been blocked. Thank you

Mcepeci, please read Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mcepeci/Archive for details on why you've been blocked. Wikipedia:Sock puppetry clarifies why having multiple accounts on Wikipedia is not allowed. Addesss the issues that you are involved in for a better chance of an unblock, than accuse other editors. Wifione ^Message 03:35, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would greatly appreciate if my block could be removed. Thank you. I think I am a responsible well balanced writer.

Editors who create socks are not generally allowed back, unless they own up to all the socks created and undertake to not repeat such actions again. Wifione ^Message 16:09, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I do not plan to continue this or repeat this or have any of my friends involved. thanks

Mcepeci, please be clear in your unblock request. Did you create sock puppets? If yes, which all user names did you create (please list all of them here in case you did create such socks)? Wifione ^Message 05:47, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I greatly appreciate it.

I am requesting to be unblocked. The other account was created by a friend of mine. Thanks.

Your reasoning doesn't seem true and transparent. I don't think such a reasoning will get you unblocked. Come clean and accept your mistakes. That's a good way to start. Anyway, from hereon, you can use the unblock template (as noted in your block notice above) to request an unblock. Wifione ^Message 14:35, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mcepeci. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]