User talk:Mcc1270

Speedy deletion nomination of Sasha Cekerevac

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Sasha Cekerevac, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ubelowme _U ^Me 12:41, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Sasha Cekerevac

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Sasha Cekerevac, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.lombardifinancial.com/authors/. As a copyright violation, Sasha Cekerevac appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Sasha Cekerevac has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Sasha Cekerevac and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Sasha Cekerevac with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Sasha Cekerevac.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 12:55, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits at Madhavi Vuppalapati

Negative information in biographies must follow certain guidelines that are not negotiable. In this article, you've added content that is of undue weight and sourced inappropriately to primary sources, such as court documents. You've also exceeded the three-revert limit, which is by itself a reason for your account to be blocked. You seem to be concentrated on editing this article negatively, so I assume you have a conflict of interest. Either way, please adhere to our policies and be extremely careful when adding this type of material. Failure to do so may result in your account being blocked or the article protected so you'll be unable to edit it either way. If you have questions about how to add this material appropriately, please post a question to the biographies noticeboard. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:53, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please read and understand WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:NPOV. If you can't or won't understand those, you should not be editing biographies at all. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:21, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Lombardi Publishing concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Lombardi Publishing, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lombardi Publishing

Hello, Mcc1270. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Lombardi Publishing".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Lombardi Publishing}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:01, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]