User talk:McMare's

Welcome!

Hello, McMare's, Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like working here and want to continue. If you need help on how to name new articles, look at the Guide to Layout, and for help on formatting the pages visit the Manual of Style. If you need general help, look at Help and the FAQ, and if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and the Policy Library. Also, don't forget to visit the Community Portal — and if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my New-Users' Talk Page.

Additional tips:

Here are some extra tips to help you get around Wikipedia:

If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, try the Sandbox.
Click on the Edit button on a page, and look at how other editors did what they did.
Always give a short explanation of your edits in the edit-summary box.
You can sign your name using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Always sign comments on Talk pages, never sign Articles.
You might want to add yourself to the New User Log
If your first language isn't English, try Wikipedia:Contributing to articles outside your native language
Full details on Wikipedia style can be found in the Manual of Style.

Happy editing!

--Mel Etitis (Talk) 09:59, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beautiful Liar

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Beautiful Liar, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ShadowHalo 02:41, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Las de la Intuición. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Thank you. ShadowHalo 22:43, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, McMare! Hablas español? Veo que el pesado de ShadowHalo te esta hinchando las bolas a vos tambien, tene cuidado porque monopoliza todos los articulos de Shakira, pero no le des bolilla, seguro es un nerd resentido. Che vi que estas haciendo las listas de los numero 1 en Argentina por año, de donde sacas la data? Suerte!

Hola! Es verdad, está medio pesado, pero bueno, supongo que lo entiendo... La info sobre los charts la suelo sacar de http://www.top40-charts.com, aunque no es 100% confiable, o al menos me da esa sensación. También podés usar http://www.lanet.lv/misc/charts, que es un poco más completo y más confiable porque no recopila información, sino que te da los links a los web sites de los charts... Beso McMare's 00:01, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! Jaja, yo me mataba sacando cálculos de la página de Top 40 Argentina y no me cerraban los números. Por ejemplo, "Que me quedes tú" sale como que fue número 1 en Argentina durante una semana en 2003 y en la página que vos decís sale que fue número 4; evidentemente no concuerdan. Gracias por la info! Suerte!

Sí, no me había dado cuenta jaja, cuando termine de hacer los listados tengo que compararlo con la página de Top 40 :S

Speedy deletion of Ultratop 40 number-one hits of 2006

A tag has been placed on Ultratop 40 number-one hits of 2006 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BigDunc (talk) 21:14, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ultratop 40 number-one hits of 2002

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ultratop 40 number-one hits of 2002, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Ultratop 40 number-one hits of 2002. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 01:13, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ultratop 40 number-one hits of 2002

I have nominated Ultratop 40 number-one hits of 2002, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultratop 40 number-one hits of 2002. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 04:18, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

French number-one hits before Nov. 4, 1984

Hi McMare's ! Thank you for having created an article about the French number-one hits of 1955. However, the number-one singles given on the Infodisc website are not official : it is a compilation from various charts, including airplays. The official chart, compiled by the SNEP, has been created in France on November 4, 1984, and these charts are available on Lescharts.com. As a result, I think it is better to stop creating the list of number-one hits before 1984. PS: Sorry for my bad English, it is not my native language ! Regards, Europe22 (talk) 00:13, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your reasoning, but the number-one hits given by Infodisc, being unofficial, must be considered with caution. For example, if you look carefully, number-one singles given after November 4, 1984 are sometimes different from those given by the SNEP. This could be a source of mistake for readers (when we say "a French number-one single", that generally means : "a number-one single on the Top 50, then the Top 100 (since 1998)", in other words, the chart established by the SNEP). Personally, I think it would be better to create a list of official number one hits in Sweden, Norway, Denmark or Portugal, for example (there are no list of number-one hits in these countries on Wikipedia), respectively available on Swedishcharts.com, Norwegiancharts.com, Danishcharts.com, Portuguescharts.com. Or you can continue creating lists of Ultratop 40 number-one singles (Belgium Wallonia) as you have done about two months ago ? ;-) Sincerely, Europe22 (talk) 01:25, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'Argentina Top 40' listed for deletion

A page that you have been involved in editing, Argentina Top 40, has been listed for deletion; you may wish to participate in the deletion discussion. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:57, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Number-one hits of 2001 (Argentina)

I have nominated Number-one hits of 2001 (Argentina), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Number-one hits of 2001 (Argentina). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:49, 22 October 2008 (UTC) Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:49, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BADCHARTS

Please do not add the Brazil Hot 100, or any other chart listed at WP:BADCHARTS, to any Wikipedia articles. Thank you.—Kww(talk) 15:36, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Sale el Sol, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 15:42, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Sale el Sol. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 15:47, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of best-selling music artists

I have once again reverted your edits as you had replaced a highly reliable source (BBC) with two weakly (if not unreliable) Spanish language sources. The only one of your three sources, Sony Japan, claims 60 million in album sales only, which is not realistic for Shakira. Shakira may have sold 60 million records, that is Singles, Albums, Videos combined, but albums only is not logical. Since I see that you are not at all familiar how that page is operated, I'm going to ask you to discuss your sources at the talk-page before submitting them. Regards.--Harout72 (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Billboard 200 Shakira milestone

Hey my friend, those two milestones you added to the Billboard 200 belong on Shakira's page and not on the Billboard 200 because there are many other feats that other artists have accomplished in terms of sales that it would be unrealistic to add them all.

The milestones on the Billboard 200 are supposed to be condensed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eternal Waves (talk • contribs) 03:00, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 04:24, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of number-one hits of 1953 (Germany)

The article List of number-one hits of 1953 (Germany) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

single charts in Germany start in 1954 → this list is incorrect/unneccesary, cf de:Wikipedia_Diskussion:Redaktion_Musik#Liste_der_Nummer-eins-Hits_in_Deutschland_(1953) –IWL 04 • 16:54, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]