User talk:Mberliet

Problems with upload of File:MikeSacks ConeyIslandPhoto June11 2009150.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MikeSacks ConeyIslandPhoto June11 2009150.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:10, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:MikeSacks ConeyIslandPhoto June11 2009150.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:MikeSacks ConeyIslandPhoto June11 2009150.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:38, 18 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 05:38, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:MikeSacksJune112009 cropped.png

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:MikeSacksJune112009 cropped.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:38, 18 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 05:38, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:MikeSacks ConeyIslandPhoto June11 2009150.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:MikeSacks ConeyIslandPhoto June11 2009150.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:20, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Pleasure Syndicate

The article The Pleasure Syndicate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While members of this group are notable, the group itself is not. Only one work is mentioned: a currently unpublished book.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Steamroller Assault (talk) 21:27, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to The Pleasure Syndicate. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Steamroller Assault (talk) 22:02, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of The Pleasure Syndicate

I have nominated The Pleasure Syndicate, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pleasure Syndicate. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Steamroller Assault (talk) 22:07, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:TonyDisanto.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:TonyDisanto.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:07, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:TonyDisanto.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TonyDisanto.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 03:05, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:MikeSacks ConeyIslandPhoto 150.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MikeSacks ConeyIslandPhoto 150.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Mosmof (talk) 03:06, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mike Sacks

The article Mike Sacks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be a writer who does not meet WP:BIO. Being widely published does not translate to notability under Wikipedia's general notability guidelines. This is basically a glorified C.V. with links to his past works, not a single source demonstrating in-depth coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mosmof (talk) 04:05, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:TonyDiSanto.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TonyDiSanto.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Mosmof (talk) 04:47, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Sacks

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mike Sacks, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.mikesacks.com/wp/bio.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:53, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mike Sacks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Sacks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Sacks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mosmof (talk) 01:45, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]