User talk:Mazet
Invitation to task force
[edit]Hi Mazet! I see you are a new user. Welcome to Wikipedia! I also noticed that you were making some edits on the Kodak article and that you noted your interest in the environmental record of corporations on your user page. It turns out a new task force within Wikipedia:WikiProject Environment has just started around that issue. The page for the task force is here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Environment/Environmental Records Task Force. If you're interested, please drop by and add your name to the list of participants! And let me know if you have any Wikipedia questions as you get going. I don't know much, but I can try to be helpful :) --Mackabean 22:04, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
MPTF
[edit]Hi Mazet!
I saw on Mackabean's talk page that you were looking for ways to get involved with projects--please come by and have a look! And don't forget that you can (and should :-) ) always sign your name by typing four tildes (~~~~) around here.
| You are being recruited by the Money and Politics Task Force, a collaborative project committed to ensuring that links between government officials and private-sector resources are accurately displayed in relevant entries. Join us! |
cheers, Cyrusc 21:35, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Please Investigate Problems on BP (British Petroleum) Wikipedia Page: Intentionally Burying Section on Gulf of Mexico Oil Disaster, Changing Name of Oil Disaster to Hide it
[edit]Any attempts to correct this (following reasonable Wikipedia guidelines) are met with aggressive reverts and edits. Intentional spinning and manipulation of article in favor of BP? Can this task force investigate this?
Currently there is no easily recognizable section on the current Gulf of Mexico Oil Disaster, surprisingly since the US Government has held BP responsible. Instead the "Oil Disaster" Section in the article keeps being given obscure (hard to recognize) names (as if someone is trying to hide the section from the public).
That section also keeps getting pushed to the bottom of the article (attempts to bury it)?
It's as if the BP Public Relations department has staff people who are aggressively spinning the article. Could this Task Force investigate this?