User talk:Mazda1973

Welcome!

Hello, Mazda1973, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Kumi Taguchi (journalist and broadcaster), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 03:14, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse question answered

Hello,

Thank you for your question at the teahouse Q&A Board! I have responded to your question if you would like to look at your article here, I have fixed it up a bit!

Happy Editing!

Gibb o boy 10:07, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kumi Taguchi (journalist)

The article Kumi Taguchi (journalist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An article on a living person sparsely sourced and only through primary and non-independent sources. A look for secondary, reliable, independent sources finds a some reportage by her, but little about her.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:52, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse advice

Hey Mazda. I'm afraid you did not receive very good advice at the Teahouse in response to your post there. That is something that those of use who answer questions there are concerned with. Sorry about that. Specifically, you were told everything looked okay with the article you asked for a review of (although a second user did say something different later, but often, by that time, the damage is already done). Unfortunately, the first post was not from an experienced Wikipedian at all, and he was incorrect. For example, the article was at the wrong title, spaced all its citations away from the content on new lines, and familiarly used the subject's first name throughout. I took care of all those issues, and you can follow what I did from the pages history. However, here were much more fundamental problems: in addition to the article being only sparsely sourced, all of the citations were to primary sources or sources that are not independent of the subject.

As you may have noticed, I have proposed the article for deletion. The templated notice above provides my rationale, but I'd like to explain a bit more clearly.

An encyclopedia is, by its nature, a tertiary source, providing a survey of information already the subject of publication in the wider world. Accordingly, and because Wikipedia is open to editing by anyone, we require that information be verifiable in reliable sources. Primary sources can be used, but they should only be used for very basic factual claims, and not for any synthesis, interpretation or analysis. For that, we need secondary sources that are independent of the topic.

We also require articles to be on notable topics, which requires the existence of those same reliable secondary, independent sources – and they need to have published detailed material about the subject – not just passing mentions. Having looked for such sources and finding unfortunately precious few, I proposed the article for deletion.

Of course, I would be happy if in response you were able to find the types of sources we look for and cite them to rehabilitate the article. I want you to succeed. It's just that in this case I think you picked the wrong topic to write about. If the article is deleted, please don't let this discourage you from continuing. Now you know the single most important metric to gauge before starting another article and, so armed, your next effort should be successful. By the way, there are lots of ways to help out here that don't require new articles to be created. I recommend the Wikipedia:Community portal. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:18, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Signing Posts

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Gibb o boy 09:04, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Kumi Taguchi Headshot.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Kumi Taguchi Headshot.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:05, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Mazda1973! Your additions to Adrienne Francis have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 21:11, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]