User talk:Mayamatabele

Mayamatabele, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mayamatabele! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Mayamatabele, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 03:22, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the warm welcome! I am certainly not tech-savvy but I am excited for this learning opportunity. Mayamatabele (talk) 14:45, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Calcitonin gene-related peptide(CGRP) Peer review

If you delete the subtitle the intro will jump to above the content box, if this is its own article then that is the preferred Wikipedia lay out. "β-CGRP is less studied." expand this sentence for clarity " In humans, β-CGRP differs in three amino acids and is encoded in a separate gene within the same vicinity." differs from what? I think the full name should be used the first time CGRP is used in each section, I don't know if this is standard but I think it would be helpful. The standard on Wikipedia is to cite each sentence, even if citing the same text multiple times in a row.

I think this is going to be a good article! You have a good outline and a clear plan. I like that you are adding a discovery section, and changing the Research section to CGRP Antagonists and simplifying it. Are you keeping the Regulation and Medicines sections as they appear in the original article or getting rid of them? The medicine section in the original looks like it needs sources and may be overly detailed. The regulation and receptor sections seem like they should be combined.

All sources seem credible. Daniypink (talk) 00:55, 30 October 2019 (UTC)