User talk:Maxforwind

September 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Murry1975 (talk) 14:47, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

April 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 19:59, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you change a quote in Muslims?

i really do require an answer given your unexplained deletions elsewhere. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 20:06, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi sir. I wanted to write the definition of the word Muslim.

That's not what I asked. Doug Weller talk 20:14, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize, sir. I didn't see that it was a quote. I thought I was changing the article under the "meaning" of the word Muslim. That is why I wrote the definition of the word Muslim.

April 2019

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:Notre-Dame de Paris fire, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Please don't forget to sign your posts. -- Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:21, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I forgot to do that, thanks for reminding me. Maxforwind (talk) 19:41, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no worries. Also, don't forget to sign on your talk page as well. :) --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:32, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, alright. Maxforwind (talk) 19:40, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edit to Jesus, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:47, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Maxforwind (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I did not see JNW’s latest warning post before I made the last edit on one of the pages. So I had already made a edit before reading his message. There was a miscommunication between us. Had I seen JNW's latest post, I would not have made the latest edit. I apologize for that. I'm trying my best with editing, I'm still trying to learn the system, and helping improve the site. Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:44, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why do you keep removing whole sections from this page? You are entitled to do that, but it does come across as evasive. El_C 21:47, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note Don't remove the above comment or your access to this talk page will be revoked. El_C 21:59, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Maxforwind (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I was blocked because of disruptive editing. I believe that the block is not necessary because I understand the reason why I have been blocked and I will not repeat this behaviour in the future and I will make useful contributions instead. I'm trying my best with editing, I'm still trying to learn the system and helping improve the site. Please unblock me. Thank you.

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk page access revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:30, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]