User talk:Max Mar

Welcome!

Hello, Max Mar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 10:26, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Curvilinear perspective may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*[http://www.biodomotica.com/perspective.htm Perspective from 0 to 6 vanishing points (Prospettiva ZeroSei by Massimo Marrazzo]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:26, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just to let you know I removed the link to a book that you added. Wikipedia may not be used for advertising. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:36, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Culture of Italy

Max Mar, I saw with interest the document that you added to the "External links" section of Culture of Italy. It contains lots of referenced factual information, though obviously written with a strongly pro-Italy point of view. I wonder, though, whether the External links section is the best place for it. There is a Wikipedia guideline on the use of external links, which has a list of links to avoid. The first item there is Any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a featured article. In other words, the site should not merely repeat information that is already or should be in the article. Links for future improvement of the page can be placed on the article's talk page. See {{refideas}}. That strikes me as being a good description of the document in question. So I wonder if you would consider moving it to the talk page, using the {{refideas}} template, and perhaps even using some of the content to expand the article? Best wishes, Wham2001 (talk) 08:11, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wham2001

thanks for your advice.

I'm a total beginner about Wikipedia and there are a lot of guidelines to follow.

Please, for the moment, if it is not a problem I would like to keep the external link.

Meantime I can study better the guidelines and write some words for an article.

Thank you :-) Max Mar (talk) 14:47, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there is a lot to learn; I am still picking it up myself, to be honest. I'm not going to remove the link myself, but it's possible that somebody else might. Best, Wham2001 (talk) 21:02, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]