User talk:Max2284

February 2024

Hi Max2284! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of American cuisine several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:American cuisine, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. You have been asked by two editors now to take this discussion to the article's talk page, per WP:BRD. The burden is on you now to justify, at Talk:American cuisine, the rationale for your changes and why you believe they improve the article, and gain consensus. "They are all European" in edit summaries does not explain anything, and your use of a free essay as a source does not appear to comply with Wikipedia's reliable sourcing requirements. Please do not make any more substantive changes to this article until you have gained talk page consensus. Thanks.. Julietdeltalima (talk) 19:33, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at American cuisine. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You have been invited to discuss changes to the article's lead by two editors, but you continue the edit warring. Please STOP. Stefen Tower_{s among the rest!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 19:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at American cuisine shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Lard Almighty (talk) 21:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]