User talk:Maurice Carbonaro/Archives/012

Message from User:189.8.107.196

Hi, dear Maurice. I'm sorry I am writing it here, but I just started editing Wikis today, and only because I saw what was a blatant biased article on Wikipedia - the article on Pope Joan. I have then made some completely unbiased editions there (really neutral, just so it would look less like Catholic propaganda) and all my edits keep getting reversed by the 3 only users who apparently mod that page, which have clear personal biases regarding the Church. I saw that you edited the criticism of the Catholic Church page in Wiki and look like a very reasonable and experient Wiki user, which is what I think is needed in that page. Would you bother taking a look at that? Thank you very much and sorry if I posted this in the wrong place :D — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.8.107.196 (talk) 23:20, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Casus belli

Hi there. Worth checking this out in relation to your recent edit to the above. Best, Philg88 ^♦talk 09:09, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"(...) It becomes necessary, therefore, to consider more closely the Bush administration's casus belli, America's Will to War. But it is imperative to recognize, as David Domke details, that the War on Terror was perceived by Bush as being of divine origin. Bush's Will to War, specifically, was God's will. (...)"? Wow! That's heavy stuff indeed. Thanks for the link. I didn't even know James A. Tyner and David Domke existed! But aren't they just a bunch of wp:povs? Anyway I have changed my recent edit in this one. I hope it's better than before. Cheers. M aurice 09:48, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a good move. God only knows what went on inside Bush's head when considering going to war(s). That's probably for the best. Cheers, Philg88 ^♦talk 09:55, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Smoking age, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Offense. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Magdi Allam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mukhabarat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Motion of no confidence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Council of ministers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

JSTOR

You should have received an email with a link to a Google form to complete - could you please either do so or email me if you did not receive it? Note that, because there are more applicants than available accounts, not responding could result in your slot being passed to a waiting editor. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there User:Nikkimaria (talk), I have received the email but was in spam. I just filled it in. Thanks. M aurice 07:04, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quite old edit about "swap" and "cache"

Your edit.

Hello! I'm sorry to remind of this, but do you have references about link ("swap" and "cache"), because I have no evidence that they are related.

Some of the real terminology includes Persistence (computer science), Computer data storage, Semiconductor memory. "swap" is some non-strictly defined function in std library (in C++ for example).

If you remember something, please let us know here: Talk:Swap_(Computer_programming)#Section_about_cache Ushkin N (talk) 07:14, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Maurice Carbonaro. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]