Jump to content

User talk:Mauriarity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Admantine123. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kushwaha have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Admantine123 (talk) 08:42, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello. In a recent edit to the page Kushwaha, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 19:10, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kushwaha, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 19:10, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Kushwaha shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Abecedare (talk) 20:42, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

information Administrator note Start a discussion at Talk:Kushwaha Your current approach of repeated reverts and communicating through edit-summaries alone, will just get you blocked. Abecedare (talk) 20:43, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay so you are saying that one can go ahead and add anything directly to the page without having a consensus achieved and when one go ahead and undo that then he have to establish the consensus in the discussion forum? Is this how it works? Mauriarity (talk) 07:41, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If the content has been present on the page for a considerable time, then yes, the responsibility for building consensus is with the editor seeking to remove the material. —C.Fred (talk) 13:26, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Got it. It would be helpful if you can define considerable time, like how many days or weeks or months is considered as a considerable time? Mauriarity (talk) 19:50, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]