User talk:Mattsanchez

Identity

If you are Matt Sanchez you will understand that we need to be careful that accounts that purport to be you are indeed under your control. Please could you make an edit with your Bluemarine account to confirm that this accounts is also used by you? WjBscribe 16:20, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User identifying as Blue Marine and Matt Sanchez

I don't have proof that you are or aren't Matt Sanchez but your pervasive and prolific posting on multiple topics are disruptive and that you are the subject of the article easily borders on violating WP protocols. Please read up on Wikipedia:Autobiography and Wikipedia:Disruptive editing. Please note: I'm not accusing you of either of these but I believe your voluminous comments on the talk pages fly in the face of the policies and do violate the spirit of cooperation needed to produce good articles.

I suggest that you

1. "chill" and when you do repost keep it civil and productive. If another editor(s) are adding unverified statements or information supported only by blogosphere rumors it will be deleted. It might not happen immediately but there are a lot of folks watching the page so it should happen rather soon. 2. Focus instead on adding the material you think is missing and should be included. Providing the weblink directly to the source and it's easy enough for someone else to start to sort it out. 3. Work on some other articles. Biographies of living people are notoriously back and forth processes that take time. You may have noticed that I have yet to make a big edit on yours since I haven't had the time to read through everything that's already happened and I've been working on other articles. You can do the same, although you're a near-expert on yourself you could easily contribute to other articles just as well. Benjiboi 20:15, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block

Matt, this isn't going to work. I'm still willing to lift the indefinite block at your main account if you withdraw the legal threat (or clarify what that post actually means if it isn't one). I will withdraw that offer if you do this again. There are legitimate ways to resolve your problem and I'm ready to cooperate, but don't push this any further. Policy allows any editor to revert your edits on sight while you're evading a block. I haven't blocked your other sockpuppet accounts but I know what they are. This tactic works against your own interests; be reasonable. Nothing personal, I'm just here to enforce policy. Durova^Charge! 09:02, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

Per clarification. Durova^Charge! 22:18, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

See User talk:Bluemarine#Blocked indefinitely. --Core desat 17:22, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Bluemarine

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Bluemarine/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Bluemarine/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, John Vandenberg (talk) 22:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]