User talk:Mattm83245

December 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Maurice Blackburn (law firm) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Maurice Blackburn (law firm) was changed by Mattm83245 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869309 on 2022-12-11T05:39:08+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:39, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Maurice Blackburn (law firm). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 05:41, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy, the reason why no sources was placed as they are case references - the words themselves are the reference (as per the rules of the supreme court (wa)) Mattm83245 (talk) 05:47, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it the case that if a law firm has mishandled legal cases, particularly high profile ones, that it would be covered in regional/national news outlets? I think it's better if you also provided specific examples of alleged mishandling below the lead section. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 17:15, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again,

As a lawyer myself, I can tell you negligence claims are common practice in Australia. only 1 out of every 100 make it into the media. The case numbers that I referenced are the reference. If you would like, I can link each case document to the reference.

I believe the public has a right to know this information when the Wiki this law firm.

Please advise.

Thanks Mattm83245 (talk) 03:13, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're free to provide the links. The reason why I asked you to provide a source was that we would need one for allegations/incidents such as these; edits such as these on other articles are prone to being reverted because they did not come with a single source, even a primary one. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 22:18, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Maurice Blackburn (law firm)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Maurice Blackburn (law firm), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:45, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]