User talk:MatthiasHammer

I didn't find it with a quick glance at the Peru article -- there's quite a few links there, which is all the more reason to keep them under control. If you point it out, I may be able to remove it or explain its inclusion. Either way, the biosphere links really don't seem appropriate (see WP:EL and probably WP:AUTO for some more in-depth explanation). Luna Santin 04:47, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to say, but that particular sentence is aimed at allowing us to link to commercial sites when they bear a direct relevance to the subject at hand -- for example, in an article about the Coca-Cola corportation, it would be appropriate to link to their website; otherwise, it generally wouldn't be. Links are intended to provide encyclopedic information on a subject. Luna Santin 04:49, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Mh1967.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mh1967.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:37, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Mh1967.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Mh1967.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 02:13, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]